Seamonkey Nightly and Aurora not building for either X86 32 bit or the X86_64 platforms

2014-04-08 Thread brian . masinick
The current build, Version 2.27a1, is the most recent build of Seamonkey Nightly that I have, and it has Build identifier: 20140214003001 = 2/17/2014. I understand that there are build server issues. Have you considered using a different build server so that we can eliminate these long lapses

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2014-03-27 Thread brian . masinick
d > to favor Seamonkey; for my specific interests and needs it works particularly > well, so I'm concerned about its current and future support. I'd appreciate > an update, thanks! > > > > -- > > Brian Masinick We had a few builds going on for a while,

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2014-03-07 Thread brian . masinick
d > to favor Seamonkey; for my specific interests and needs it works particularly > well, so I'm concerned about its current and future support. I'd appreciate > an update, thanks! > > > > -- > > Brian Masinick Well, we were able to get nightly builds fo

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-19 Thread Brian Masinick
continue to be available for my hardware, just not the Seamonkey builds. > > > > Any particular reason for this? While I use both browsers, I do still > tend to favor Seamonkey; for my specific interests and needs it works > particularly well, so I&#x

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-12 Thread brian . masinick
ent string that you > > cited : > > > > > User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 > > Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24a1 > > > > Philip Taylor > > > > Brian Masinick wrote: > > > > > Perhaps

Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-12 Thread brian . masinick
n for this? While I use both browsers, I do still tend to favor Seamonkey; for my specific interests and needs it works particularly well, so I'm concerned about its current and future support. I'd appreciate an update, thanks! --