Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-23 Thread gjikkl
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Jahwohl master gjikkl! MAster? no, I know computer and I can tell when someone talks nonsense and think they know what are they talk about, you should be more humble and accept the correction, because if you feel I'm making myself superior I'm not, I just

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-18 Thread gjikkl
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: gjikkl wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. Pray tell, what pages are opened in those 18 tabs? Sorry I can&#

Re: SM 2.9.1 color scheme

2012-05-18 Thread gjikkl
That's not SM fault, is yours, something is wrong with your video sus-system. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-18 Thread gjikkl
INstead why don't you ask yourself: "am I making stupid assumptions based on information I recollected myself as true?" How can you assume a PC would have 4MB of RAM? not even a Cell phone has that little, if you don't know anything about computers I'd suggest to shut up and inform yourself bef

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-18 Thread gjikkl
Ed Mullen wrote: Win 7 32-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 12 tabs open. 155,740 Kb of RAM used. Win 7 64-bit, 4Gb RAM, SM 2.9.1. 18 tabs open. 519,296 Kb of RAM used. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozill

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-18 Thread gjikkl
Jean Zebloski wrote: Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time? Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has been initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for now he have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY SLO

Re: [Suggestions]

2012-05-17 Thread gjikkl
Philip Chee wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:59:12 -0400, gjikkl wrote: * Include SunBird in SeaMonkey. Lightning (Sunbird as an extension) is available for SeaMonkey: https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/lightning/ (And has been for quite a while. Phil I know but I don't want it

Re: [Suggestions]

2012-05-11 Thread gjikkl
errata: * Make 'Scriptish' part of SeaMonkey/FireFox, since them can't run USER JavaScript scripts. Why don't you add the guy that makes it to Mozilla team? Yes user scripts to be installed and ran are only possible with Scriptish. ___ support-seamonk

[Suggestions]

2012-05-11 Thread gjikkl
I think this additions are not only useful but necesary to make SeaMonkey an up-to-date Internet suit & even more useful than already is. * Make the HTML Editor to have a BBCode mode, to only edit BBCode for forum posts. You'd select which BBcode is supported by your forum to avoid errors. *

Re: Please make possible to read Unicode Web addresses

2012-02-21 Thread gjikkl
Security Issue? why? the characters are put in a form of hexadecimal representation preceded by a percentage symbol, is not mystery or it doesn't do anything than that; is just represented on another way for some reason, maybe hiding the URI/L or some new standard, but is not security-related i

Re: Please make possible to read Unicode Web addresses

2012-02-21 Thread gjikkl
I stand correct on the percentage-encoding not being Unicode. Well IMO this shouldn't even be a problem, is kinda of common this percentage-encoding and all browsers should recognize it and make the proper translation. ___ support-seamonkey mailing l

Please make possible to read Unicode Web addresses

2012-02-19 Thread gjikkl
I'd like SeaMonkey be able to read http%3A%2F%2Fi283.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fkk284%2Fdismadrosa13%2Fline.gif as http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk284/dismadrosa13/line.gif Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozill

Re: x64

2012-02-19 Thread gjikkl
MCBastos wrote: In fact, I don't even see the point of having a PDF plug-in. Opening the PDF in the browser is a bad user experience, in my opinion. I have disabled mine and never missed it -- opening a locally-cached copy of the file in a separate viewer window is MUCH better. I disagree with

Re: x64

2012-02-13 Thread gjikkl
Yes please make a 64-bit version, is also good for Mozilla, native support from Windows 64-bits, take advantage of 64-bit environment, no WoW64 emulator, everyone is moving to 64-bit since is the future, come on people, what stops you from doing it? I suggest you keep the 32-bit version for abo