Jean Zebloski wrote:
Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has been initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for now he have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY SLOWLY.Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time?
_______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
