Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

Seamonkey: 3h 09m Opera: 4h 02m I used http://www.internet-guide.co.uk/static-html.html in both browsers and let the browsers be while they had the page loaded for a couple of minutes before I checked the readings. Regards. ___ support-seamonkey mailin

Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

Oh, sorry. I missed out on exactly what you wanted me to use as reference. I was just about to go out and visit a friend but I will have this tab visible so that when I get home I won't forget to report how the new test with a simple static html page turns out. Regards Rickard G Den fre

Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

C, WHY ...) open ? > > Philip Taylor > ---- > rickard wrote: > > I noticed it on my new computer, an ASUS K53SV, without external AC > power in Battery Save Mode. In this mode I can get up to 6 hours of use when > I use IE 9 and about the same with Firefox x64 nightly and Ope

Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2 hours of use left. I surf the same sites with all the browsers. Do you people know why this might be the case? Regards Rickard G ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support