Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-22 Thread Phillip Jones
Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: ...not just Sno-Lep. For any install of SM on a Mac you just drag the app from the disk image to where you want it. So I'm left thinking that a truly clean install on a Mac would require wiping out everything

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Ray_Net
Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Mike C
Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Phillip Jones
Ray_Net wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Phillip Jones
Mike C wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Phillip Jones
Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread JF Perron
Ken Rudolph a écrit : Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Phillip Jones
Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-21 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: ...not just Sno-Lep. For any install of SM on a Mac you just drag the app from the disk image to where you want it. So I'm left thinking that a truly clean install on a Mac would require wiping out everything associated

2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Ken Rudolph
Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was attempting to contact

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Mike C
Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread JAS
Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was