Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-04 Thread Daniel
Phillip Jones wrote: Daniel wrote: Daniel wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Daniel schrieb: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logi

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-03 Thread Phillip Jones
Daniel wrote: Daniel wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Daniel schrieb: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-"

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-03 Thread Daniel
Daniel wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Daniel schrieb: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be the a

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-03 Thread Daniel
Martin Freitag wrote: Daniel schrieb: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be the answer but nothing

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-02 Thread Phillip Jones
Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: Daniel wrote: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-02 Thread Martin Freitag
MCBastos schrieb: Interviewed by CNN on 2/12/2009 09:50, Martin Freitag told the world: Use the \ (see the View Menu => threads ;-) ) regards I was looking for this, and it was right there on the menu all the time! Thanks for pointing it out... But now that you mention this... shouldn't the

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-02 Thread Martin Freitag
Phillip Jones schrieb: Daniel wrote: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be the answer but nothing

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-02 Thread Phillip Jones
Daniel wrote: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be the answer but nothing happens. Tapping the "/"

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-02 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 2/12/2009 09:50, Martin Freitag told the world: > Use the \ (see the View Menu => threads ;-) ) > regards I was looking for this, and it was right there on the menu all the time! Thanks for pointing it out... But now that you mention this... shouldn't there be keyboard shor

Re: Collapsing threads

2009-12-02 Thread Martin Freitag
Daniel schrieb: Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be the answer but nothing happens. Tapping the "

Collapsing threads

2009-12-02 Thread Daniel
Currently using SM 1.1.15, but the situation has been ongoing. When viewing threads here, I can tap the "*" sign and all threads are expanded. How do I go the other way, i.e. collapse the threads?? Logically tapping the "-" should be the answer but nothing happens. Tapping the "/" does nothi