Re: Small font displaying poorly on this website, but it looks good in Firefox

2016-10-12 Thread Paul Bergsagel
i...@opensesamedoor.com wrote: When I look at this website (this is the first time I noticed the problem), the small fonts are distorted. The same site looks fine in Firefox. See this page as an example: https://www.malwarebytes.com/products/ Looks fine to me ->Seamonkey 2.40 OS10 (10.7.5)

Re: Small font displaying poorly on this website, but it looks good in Firefox

2016-10-12 Thread Desiree
On 10/12/2016 7:36 AM, i...@opensesamedoor.com wrote: When I look at this website (this is the first time I noticed the problem), the small fonts are distorted. The same site looks fine in Firefox. See this page as an example: https://www.malwarebytes.com/products/ It looks fine to me with

Small font displaying poorly on this website, but it looks good in Firefox

2016-10-12 Thread info
When I look at this website (this is the first time I noticed the problem), the small fonts are distorted. The same site looks fine in Firefox. See this page as an example: https://www.malwarebytes.com/products/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Why Seamonkey was really a very good name

2015-12-17 Thread cmcadams
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20151217-the-tiny-creatures-that-flew-to-the-moon-twice-and-survived ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-27 Thread John Duncan
ABP, and the SM process often consumes 1.5-2.0 GB (I have 20-30 tabs open.) Regards. 2.38 seems very good on memory usage so far on my end (OS X 10.11). I use µBlock origin, so the fix does not affect me, but I've been writing a paper today with around 20-30 tabs open (including google docs

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-27 Thread EE
Jim wrote: Ant wrote: On 9/25/2015 1:27 PM, Mason83 wrote: http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/23/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-and-now-adblock-plus-uses-a-lot-less-memory/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77999

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-26 Thread Ant
On 9/25/2015 1:27 PM, Mason83 wrote: http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/23/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-and-now-adblock-plus-uses-a-lot-less-memory/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77999

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-26 Thread Jim
Ant wrote: On 9/25/2015 1:27 PM, Mason83 wrote: http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/23/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-and-now-adblock-plus-uses-a-lot-less-memory/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77999

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-26 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Jim wrote: Ant wrote: So we will see this in the upcoming SM v2.38? It appears v2.38 was released today. See http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ I didn't get the automatic install screen when I started up SeaMonkey, so I am waiting for that. I checked manually (Help | Check for Updates)

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-26 Thread Ant
On 9/26/2015 12:11 PM, Mason83 wrote: On 26/09/2015 13:43, Ant wrote: On 9/25/2015 1:27 PM, Mason83 wrote: http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/23/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-and-now-adblock-plus-uses-a-lot-less-memory/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77999

Re: Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-26 Thread Mason83
On 26/09/2015 13:43, Ant wrote: > On 9/25/2015 1:27 PM, Mason83 wrote: > >> http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/23/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-and-now-adblock-plus-uses-a-lot-less-memory/ >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77999 >> >>

Good news coming for users of Adblock Plus

2015-09-25 Thread Mason83
http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/23/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-and-now-adblock-plus-uses-a-lot-less-memory/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77999 https://blog.mozilla.org/nnethercote/2015/07/01/firefox-41-will-use-less-memory-when-running-adblock-plus/

Re: What is a good replacement for IE View extension for SeaMonkey web browsers?

2015-06-08 Thread Ant
On 6/3/2015 10:30 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. I noticed an updated version, but its release notes and reviews https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ie-view/reviews show a new ownership and spywares. :( Thank you in advance. :) No answers? :( -- ... I'd wait for a hot Texas day, see? Tie

Re: What is a good replacement for IE View extension for SeaMonkey web browsers?

2015-06-08 Thread WaltS48
On 06/08/2015 09:50 PM, Ant wrote: On 6/3/2015 10:30 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. I noticed an updated version, but its release notes and reviews https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ie-view/reviews show a new ownership and spywares. :( Thank you in advance. :) No answers? :( Thought

good-news-israel-time-is-on-our-side/

2015-04-18 Thread GerardJan
http://unitedwithisrael.org/good-news-israel-time-is-on-our-side/ -- Gertjan DYSLEXICS OF THE WORLD, UNTIE! User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1 File: libflashplayer.so Path: /home/gerardjan/Downloads/seamonkey/plugins

Re: Meanwhile, on the good news part of the news...

2014-12-21 Thread Philip Chee
://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Meanwhile, on the good news part of the news...

2014-12-20 Thread Geoff Welsh
Geoff Welsh wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 28/11/2014 07:42, Geoff Welsh wrote: This addressing bug fix has landed; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=970456 and is fixed in nightlies of TB they say. Not sure if/how/when that would/might drift over to SM.

Re: Meanwhile, on the good news part of the news...

2014-11-28 Thread Philip Chee
, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey

Re: Meanwhile, on the good news part of the news...

2014-11-28 Thread Geoff Welsh
Philip Chee wrote: On 28/11/2014 07:42, Geoff Welsh wrote: This addressing bug fix has landed; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=970456 and is fixed in nightlies of TB they say. Not sure if/how/when that would/might drift over to SM.

Re: Meanwhile, on the good news part of the news...

2014-11-27 Thread Geoff Welsh
MCBastos wrote: Thunderbird development (which reflects on Seamonkey), which has been sort of stalled for a while, seems to be reenergized. Look at this: https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2014/11/thunderbird-reorganizes-at-2014-toronto-summit/ Among other things, there's now a roadmap for

Meanwhile, on the good news part of the news...

2014-11-25 Thread MCBastos
Thunderbird development (which reflects on Seamonkey), which has been sort of stalled for a while, seems to be reenergized. Look at this: https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2014/11/thunderbird-reorganizes-at-2014-toronto-summit/ Among other things, there's now a roadmap for Thunderbird 38 (due

Re: Meanwhile, on the good news part of the news...

2014-11-25 Thread Tony Mechelynck
On 26/11/14 00:28, MCBastos wrote: Thunderbird development (which reflects on Seamonkey), which has been sort of stalled for a while, seems to be reenergized. Look at this: https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2014/11/thunderbird-reorganizes-at-2014-toronto-summit/ Among other things, there's

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-30 Thread EE
Hartmut Figge wrote: EE wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) I am using Firefox compatibility. That audio did not

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-30 Thread Ant
I much prefer to have to click a play button to get an audio item to play rather than have it start by itself. I am going to leave things alone. Ditto. :) -- /\___/\ / /\ /\ \ Worker Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-29 Thread Ant
On 6/28/2014 5:36 PM PT, Trane Francks typed: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) Bah, I want that default enabled to avoid incompatibilities with web sites. ;)

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-29 Thread EE
Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) Hartmut I am using Firefox compatibility. That audio did not play for me

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-29 Thread Hartmut Figge
EE wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) I am using Firefox compatibility. That audio did not play for me

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Ant
On 6/10/2014 6:18 AM PT, Ant typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( Hmm,

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Rufus
Ant wrote: On 6/10/2014 6:18 AM PT, Ant typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( Hmm,

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread EE
Ant wrote: On 6/10/2014 6:18 AM PT, Ant typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( Hmm,

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Trane Francks
On 6/29/14 6:32 AM +0900, EE wrote: Ant wrote: On 6/10/2014 6:18 AM PT, Ant typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( Hmm,

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Hartmut Figge
Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) I would if I could find it... went through the entire prefs tree (except Composer,

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Hartmut Figge
Paul B. Gallagher: Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) I would if I could find it... went through the entire prefs tree

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Ant
On 6/28/2014 3:03 PM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) Bah, I want that default enabled to avoid incompatibilities with web sites.

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Ant
On 6/28/2014 2:32 PM PT, EE typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( Hmm,

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Hartmut Figge wrote: Paul B. Gallagher: Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) I would if I could find it... went through

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread Trane Francks
On 6/29/14 8:44 AM +0900, Ant wrote: On 6/28/2014 3:03 PM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) Bah, I want that default enabled to

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-28 Thread WaltS48
On 06/28/2014 08:33 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Paul B. Gallagher: Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-13 Thread Daniel
On 13/06/2014 1:20 PM, Ant wrote: On 6/12/2014 8:03 PM PT, GerardJan typed: It works in my 64-bit SeaMonkey v2.26 in my 64-bit Debian stable box. Now, need to make it work on my office's machine at work. :)

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-13 Thread Ant
Check your prefbar.json file in your profile. The WebM button should be: }, prefbar:button:webm: { type: check, label: WebM, prefstring: media.webm.enabled, topref: value, frompref: value }, It it's not, then just replace with the above. Note, exclude the comma

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-13 Thread Ant
Check your prefbar.json file in your profile. The WebM button should be: }, prefbar:button:webm: { type: check, label: WebM, prefstring: media.webm.enabled, topref: value, frompref: value }, It it's not, then just replace with the above. Note, exclude the comma

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-13 Thread GerardJan
Ant wrote: Check your prefbar.json file in your profile. The WebM button should be: }, prefbar:button:webm: { type: check, label: WebM, prefstring: media.webm.enabled, topref: value, frompref: value }, It it's not, then just replace with the above. Note,

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-12 Thread Ant
On 6/11/2014 8:18 PM PT, pjdkru...@gmail.com typed: Does media.autoplay.enabled not work? Nope. :( -- What I fear most from the stars is not aliens for they have intelligence, but I fear social creatures like ants, that can overrun humans, that feel no emotion, and see us as an easy prey

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-12 Thread Ant
On 6/10/2014 6:18 AM PT, Ant typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( It works in my 64-bit SeaMonkey v2.26 in my 64-bit Debian stable box.

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-12 Thread Ant
On 6/11/2014 6:19 PM PT, NoOp typed: I decided to use Prefbar's method again since I don't see any other options, but I cannot seem to get it to work on my office's 64-bit W7 machine's SeaMonkey v2.26 web browser. Am I missing something or doing it wrong in PrefBar?

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-12 Thread GerardJan
Ant escribió: On 6/10/2014 6:18 AM PT, Ant typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( It works in my 64-bit SeaMonkey v2.26 in my 64-bit Debian

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-12 Thread GerardJan
Ant escribió: On 6/11/2014 6:19 PM PT, NoOp typed: I decided to use Prefbar's method again since I don't see any other options, but I cannot seem to get it to work on my office's 64-bit W7 machine's SeaMonkey v2.26 web browser. Am I missing something or doing it wrong in PrefBar?

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-12 Thread Ant
On 6/12/2014 8:05 PM PT, GerardJan typed: ... OK, I will check when I am at work again. ? -- You know what you are Earl? You're a little, tiny, busy ant. You too, Mike. Both you guys, with your mortgages and your term life insurance and your webber kettles(??). Ant. Ant. All of you, you're

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-12 Thread Ant
On 6/12/2014 8:03 PM PT, GerardJan typed: It works in my 64-bit SeaMonkey v2.26 in my 64-bit Debian stable box. Now, need to make it work on my office's machine at work. :)

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-11 Thread NoOp
On 06/09/2014 01:19 PM, Ant wrote: W3BNR wrote: I decided to use Prefbar's method again since I don't see any other options, but I cannot seem to get it to work on my office's 64-bit W7 machine's SeaMonkey v2.26 web browser. Am I missing something or doing it wrong in PrefBar?

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-11 Thread pjdkrunkt
Does media.autoplay.enabled not work? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-10 Thread Ant
On 6/9/2014 1:19 PM PT, Ant typed: ... It still doesn't work. I was hoping Id's lowercased letters would make it work. I am using PrefBar v6.4.0. :( Weird. It only works in my home's updated XP Pro. SP3 machine. :( -- The constant creeping of ants will wear away the stone. --unknown /\___/\

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-10 Thread EE
any good on demand blockers for these HTML5 videos especially when I open multiple tabs with videos. Are there any good ones for the (lat/new)est web browsers yet? They should be like FlashBlock, Mozilla web browsers' internal plug-in blockers, etc. Why not use Flashblock? It can block HTML5

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-09 Thread W3BNR
to play the videos right away. I have not seen any good on demand blockers for these HTML5 videos especially when I open multiple tabs with videos. Are there any good ones for the (lat/new)est web browsers yet? They should be like FlashBlock, Mozilla web browsers' internal plug-in blockers, etc

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-09 Thread Ant
On 6/9/2014 4:43 AM PT, W3BNR typed: You could install Prefbar and have a button turn it false/true (on/off). Yes, but I still prefer ondemand play like blockers do. By default, don't play. I click on the blocked area to play. -- It is said that the lonely eagle flies to the mountain peaks

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-09 Thread Ant
W3BNR wrote: media.webm.enabled - set to false in about:config. But then I will have to turn it on again via there again if I want it. I want on demand play when blocked. You could install Prefbar and have a button turn it false/true (on/off). I decided to use Prefbar's method again since

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-09 Thread W3BNR
On 6/9/2014 1:57 PM Ant submitted the following: W3BNR wrote: media.webm.enabled - set to false in about:config. But then I will have to turn it on again via there again if I want it. I want on demand play when blocked. You could install Prefbar and have a button turn it false/true

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-09 Thread W3BNR
Ignore my previous post. Sorry. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-09 Thread Ant
W3BNR wrote: I decided to use Prefbar's method again since I don't see any other options, but I cannot seem to get it to work on my office's 64-bit W7 machine's SeaMonkey v2.26 web browser. Am I missing something or doing it wrong in PrefBar? http://i.imgur.com/2Ufl8zy.gif for a screen

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-09 Thread B00ze
away. I have not seen any good on demand blockers for these HTML5 videos especially when I open multiple tabs with videos. Are there any good ones for the (lat/new)est web browsers yet? They should be like FlashBlock, Mozilla web browsers' internal plug-in blockers, etc. Why not use Flashblock

Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-08 Thread Ant
Hello. I noticed more and more web sites (e.g., FunnyOrDie.com and TheOnion.com) are going dumping Flash and using HTML5 videos to play their embedded *.webm video files. They get annoying when I don't want to play the videos right away. I have not seen any good on demand blockers

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-08 Thread EE
Ant wrote: Hello. I noticed more and more web sites (e.g., FunnyOrDie.com and TheOnion.com) are going dumping Flash and using HTML5 videos to play their embedded *.webm video files. They get annoying when I don't want to play the videos right away. I have not seen any good on demand blockers

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-08 Thread Ed Mullen
Ant pounded out : Hello. I noticed more and more web sites (e.g., FunnyOrDie.com and TheOnion.com) are going dumping Flash and using HTML5 videos to play their embedded *.webm video files. They get annoying when I don't want to play the videos right away. I have not seen any good on demand

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-08 Thread Ant
good on demand blockers for these HTML5 videos especially when I open multiple tabs with videos. Are there any good ones for the (lat/new)est web browsers yet? They should be like FlashBlock, Mozilla web browsers' internal plug-in blockers, etc. Thank you in advance. :) http://comments.gmane.org

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-08 Thread Ant
On 6/8/2014 10:08 AM PT, EE typed: I noticed more and more web sites (e.g., FunnyOrDie.com and TheOnion.com) are going dumping Flash and using HTML5 videos to play their embedded *.webm video files. They get annoying when I don't want to play the videos right away. I have not seen any good

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-08 Thread Desiree
On 6/8/2014 6:59 AM, Ant wrote: Hello. I noticed more and more web sites (e.g., FunnyOrDie.com and TheOnion.com) are going dumping Flash and using HTML5 videos to play their embedded *.webm video files. They get annoying when I don't want to play the videos right away. I have not seen any good

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-08 Thread Ant
On 6/8/2014 7:12 PM PT, Desiree typed: There is an extension for youtube HTML5 videos StopTube that works great. Something like it needs to be expanded to work on other sites. Bummer, only on YouTube. :( -- Fall in those single lines like army ants... --unknown /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @

Re: A good AdBlock Plus replacement for SeaMonkey web browsers?

2014-05-22 Thread pjdkrunkt
On Friday, May 16, 2014 2:03:20 PM UTC-4, Ant wrote: ABP is getting bloated and buggy especially with https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1t=22906 , http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29247514- , etc. Are there any good ad blocker replacements for SeaMonkeys in Linux/Debian

Re: A good AdBlock Plus replacement for SeaMonkey web browsers?

2014-05-22 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/16/2014 11:03 AM, Ant wrote: ABP is getting bloated and buggy especially with https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1t=22906 , http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29247514- , etc. Are there any good ad blocker replacements for SeaMonkeys in Linux/Debian, Mac OS X, and Windows

A good AdBlock Plus replacement for SeaMonkey web browsers?

2014-05-16 Thread Ant
ABP is getting bloated and buggy especially with https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1t=22906 , http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29247514- , etc. Are there any good ad blocker replacements for SeaMonkeys in Linux/Debian, Mac OS X, and Windows? Thank you in advance. :) -- Why eat

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-10 Thread Ant
On 1/9/2014 11:56 AM PT, Kertesz Laszlo typed: ... Well im concerned about this too. Not only media play, but also on certain sites i have seen some flashy (pun intended) html5/svg based advertisements with moving stuff etc, looking exacctly like the flash based ones. Besides being annoying,

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-09 Thread Desiree
On 1/7/2014 8:17 PM, Ant wrote: Hello. I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers for Flash, Silverlight, etc. Thank you in advance. :) Both browsers have Click to Play plugin which works

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-09 Thread Ant
On 1/9/2014 4:21 AM PT, Desiree typed: Both browsers have Click to Play plugin which works for HTML5 as well as Flash. You can also install Click to Play Manager on both browsers for easy whitelisting. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/click-to-play-manager/?src=search You are

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-09 Thread Kertesz Laszlo
Ant wrote: On 1/9/2014 4:21 AM PT, Desiree typed: Both browsers have Click to Play plugin which works for HTML5 as well as Flash. You can also install Click to Play Manager on both browsers for easy whitelisting. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/click-to-play-manager/?src=search

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread Ant
On 1/7/2014 10:27 PM PT, David E. Ross typed: On 1/7/2014 10:17 PM, Ant wrote: Hello. I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers for Flash, Silverlight, etc. Thank you in advance. :) I

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread Ant
On 1/7/2014 10:27 PM PT, David E. Ross typed: I don't think FlashBlock would block HTML5 videos anyway. http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ says 2013-03-23: Flashblock 1.5.17 released for Firefox 4.0 to Firefox 22.0 (Nightly). 2013-03-23: Flashblock 1.3.20 released for Seamonkey 2.0 to 2.19

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread Ed
On 1/8/2014 1:17 AM Ant submitted the following: Hello. I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers for Flash, Silverlight, etc. Thank you in advance. :) If you don't want to see it, in

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread Ant
'. Thanks. It would be easier to have a button. :) -- I don't know how good ants are at swimmin', but I'd be willing to bet that a good fire'd get their attention. --MacGyver in Trumbo's World episode /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread Ant
. Otherwise, I can provide it to you for you to download and import into PrefBar. Please kindly share it with us? :) -- I don't know how good ants are at swimmin', but I'd be willing to bet that a good fire'd get their attention. --MacGyver in Trumbo's World episode /\___/\ Ant(Dude

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/8/2014 8:04 AM, Ant wrote: On 1/7/2014 10:27 PM PT, David E. Ross typed: I have the PrefBar extension installed. I created a button to block HTML5 media. It toggles the media.autoplay.enabled preference variable. Given that you now know what preference variable is involved, you can

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread W3BNR
On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed: I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers for Flash, Silverlight, etc. If you don't want to see it, in

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread W3BNR
On 1/8/2014 11:40 AM W3BNR submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed: I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers for Flash,

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-08 Thread Mr. Ed
On 1/8/2014 1:44 PM W3BNR submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 11:40 AM W3BNR submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed: I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and

What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-07 Thread Ant
Hello. I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers for Flash, Silverlight, etc. Thank you in advance. :) -- Whence we see spiders, flies, or ants entombed and preserved forever in amber, a

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

2014-01-07 Thread David E. Ross
On 1/7/2014 10:17 PM, Ant wrote: Hello. I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers for Flash, Silverlight, etc. Thank you in advance. :) I don't think FlashBlock would block HTML5

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:59:53 -0500, Jay Garcia j...@jaynospamgarcia.com wrote: On 03.11.2012 16:47, JohnW-Mpls wrote: --- Original Message --- I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some changes. SM 2.13.2 could not uncover many links at

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some changes. SM 2.13.2 could not uncover many links at GoDaddy. I switched to FireFox and

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:50:36 -0700, Michael Gordon mgord...@earthlink.net wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some changes. SM 2.13.2 could not uncover many links at GoDaddy. I switched to FireFox and all those

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:47:52 -0500, JohnW-Mpls john...@comcast.net wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some changes. SM 2.13.2 could not uncover many links at GoDaddy. I switched to FireFox and all those links worked - I then could

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
JohnW-Mpls wrote: Not a problem, I use javascript alllot. However, I went to look at my SM settings and cannot remember were JavaScript is mentioned. Tools Options Advanced Scripts Plugins More time used up fiddling. Install the PrefBar and put a checkbox for JavaScript (and other

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Michael Gordon
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:47:52 -0500, JohnW-Mpls john...@comcast.net wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some changes. SM 2.13.2 could not uncover many links at GoDaddy. I switched to FireFox and all those links

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Michael Gordon
JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some changes. SM 2.13.2 could not uncover many links at GoDaddy. I

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread David E. Ross
On 11/4/12 9:28 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some changes. SM 2.13.2 could

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Rufus
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/4/12 9:28 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Michael Gordon
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/4/12 9:28 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to make some

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Rufus
Michael Gordon wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/4/12 9:28 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Michael Gordon
Rufus wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/4/12 9:28 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Michael Gordon
Rufus wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/4/12 9:28 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and was on their website to

Re: SM 2.13.2 not good at GoDaddy

2012-11-04 Thread Rufus
Michael Gordon wrote: Rufus wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/4/12 9:28 AM, Michael Gordon wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:51:40 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: JohnW-Mpls wrote: I work with a number of accounts and websites at GoDaddy and

<    1   2   3   >