Hartmut Figge wrote:
Ken Rudolph:
The title says it all. I'm discovering all sorts of things that now
work that didn't before with SM 1.x. For instance: the Reference
line now works the way it's supposed to!
Ehm, if you expand Message-Id or References, your choice is forgotten at
the next
Barry Edwin Gilmour:
Any chance of linking us to your patch+info, Hartmut ? Barry.
I could upload it, but let's see its size.
h...@e675 ~ $ wc -l seam-patch/patch_status-drehlinge-2
29 seam-patch/patch_status-drehlinge-2
29 lines. Well, regarding the huge amount of quotings in many replies
Hartmut Figge:
An attachment of such a small text file should be fine. Unless the
newsserver refuses. Let's try.
Successful. What to do with the patch? Either applying to the source
before compiling or editing the .xml in the ready SM2. Location there is
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Hartmut Figge:
An attachment of such a small text file should be fine. Unless the
newsserver refuses. Let's try.
Successful. What to do with the patch? Either applying to the source
before compiling or editing the .xml in the ready SM2. Location there is
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Hartmut Figge:
An attachment of such a small text file should be fine. Unless the
newsserver refuses. Let's try.
Successful. What to do with the patch? Either applying to the source
before compiling or editing the .xml in the ready SM2. Location there is
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
[MailNews References header twisty]
I know votes don't mean much, but is there a bug raised that I could
vote on it!
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468076
As you can see from the comments the basic approach was rejected for not
remembering the state
The title says it all. I'm discovering all sorts of things that now
work that didn't before with SM 1.x. For instance: the Reference
line now works the way it's supposed to! That's just one; but there
are all sorts of big and little touches which are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ken Rudolph wrote:
The title says it all. I'm discovering all sorts of things that now
work that didn't before with SM 1.x. For instance: the Reference line
now works the way it's supposed to! That's just one; but there are all
sorts of big and little touches which are greatly appreciated.
Ken Rudolph:
The title says it all. I'm discovering all sorts of things that now
work that didn't before with SM 1.x. For instance: the Reference
line now works the way it's supposed to!
Ehm, if you expand Message-Id or References, your choice is forgotten at
the next posting. At least it
9 matches
Mail list logo
