Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 7/11/11 6:49 AM, Jay Garcia wrote: > On 11.07.2011 08:26, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > --- Original Message --- > >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: >>> They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken sniffing, IMO. >>> >>> All sniffing is

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

It doesn't work using IE9 either. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Daniel wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.07.2011 07:30, Daniel wrote: --- Original Message --- PhillipJones wrote: NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not s

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 07/11/2011 01:14 PM, Rick Merrill wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 07/10/2011 04:09 PM, Rick Merrill wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: >>> >>> It is HTTPS for heavens sake! >>>

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

NoOp wrote: On 07/10/2011 04:09 PM, Rick Merrill wrote: NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: It is HTTPS for heavens sake! I get the same message using IE8! Yes, so? However if you follow the lin

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.07.2011 10:34, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I can open the registration page, too, with SM 2.0.14, but I haven't attempted to fill in the data and create an account. Is registering the sticking point, or do some people have trouble seeing the registration page? Users runn

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 11.07.2011 10:34, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: > >> On 11.07.2011 08:11, Daniel wrote: >> >>> Didn't try, just got to the page that NoOp was not being able to get to >>>

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.07.2011 08:11, Daniel wrote: Didn't try, just got to the page that NoOp was not being able to get to That's the

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.07.2011 08:11, Daniel wrote: Didn't try, just got to the page that NoOp was not being able to get to That's the registration page that i

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Bill Davidsen wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: >>> They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken >>> sniffing, IMO. >> >> All sniffing is broken, IMO. > > If you are willing to do without any feature introduced after > MOSAIC, or Netscape, o

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 11.07.2011 08:26, Bill Davidsen wrote: --- Original Message --- > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: >> >>> They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken >>> sniffing, IMO. >> >> All sniffing is broken, IMO. >> > If you are willing to do without a

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 11.07.2011 08:11, Daniel wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 11.07.2011 07:30, Daniel wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> PhillipJones wrote: NoOp wrote: > Can anyone else confirm: > >

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken sniffing, IMO. All sniffing is broken, IMO. If you are willing to do without any feature introduced after MOSAIC, or Netscape, or IE6, or wherever you draw you line, t

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.07.2011 07:30, Daniel wrote: --- Original Message --- PhillipJones wrote: NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by We

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Jay Garcia wrote: On 11.07.2011 07:30, Daniel wrote: --- Original Message --- PhillipJones wrote: NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by We

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro!" Web Dynpro client inspection Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 11.07.2011 07:30, Daniel wrote: --- Original Message --- > PhillipJones wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >>> Can anyone else confirm: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Receive: >>> "Sorry, your browser/program is not suppor

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

PhillipJones wrote: NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro!" Web Dynpro client inspection Sorry, your browser/program is not s

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

NoOp wrote: On 07/10/2011 12:21 PM, PhillipJones wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: ... Are you sure Firefox 3.6.* doesn't go though? I'm able to go through sending just: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (rv:1.9.2) or even just: User-Agent: rv:1.9.2 Sending: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (rv:2.0) or: Us

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 07/10/2011 12:21 PM, PhillipJones wrote: > Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: ... >> Are you sure Firefox 3.6.* doesn't go though? I'm able to go through >> sending just: >> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (rv:1.9.2) >> >> or even just: >> >> User-Agent: rv:1.9.2 >> >> Sending: >> >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 07/10/2011 04:09 PM, Rick Merrill wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Can anyone else confirm: >> >> >> > > It is HTTPS for heavens sake! > > I get the same message using IE8! > > > Yes, so? However if you follow

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: It is HTTPS for heavens sake! I get the same message using IE8! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

PhillipJones wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I ge

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:29:33 -0400, /PhillipJones/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.1

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get https://careers.amt

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 7/10/2011 9:20 AM PT, David E. Ross typed: I have filed an online complaint with the Amtrak Inspector General, citing a potential violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act because audio browsers for the blind might also be excluded. At the Inspector General's Web page, I found a link

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 07/10/2011 05:28 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: > >> WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 >> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; >> rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox >> >> Clicking on the "Regist

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 07/10/2011 10:30 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: > >> FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get >> https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous as the correct page, not >> an error page. > > OK, now click "Search for jobs" and you get this: > > Error when proces

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Jay Garcia wrote: On 10.07.2011 11:10, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: --- Original Message --- Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 07/10/2011 09:20 AM, David E. Ross wrote: ... > > At the bottom of > , > I see the following: > > Browser Requirements > > * The Careers website is best viewed with Internet Explorer 7

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Jay Garcia wrote: FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous as the correct page, not an error page. OK, now click "Search for jobs" and you get this: Error when processing your request What has happened? The URL http://saperec.amtr

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 10.07.2011 11:10, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: --- Original Message --- > Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: >> On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: >> >>> Start here: >>> https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous >>> and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. >> >> FF 5

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 7/9/11 9:11 PM, NoOp wrote: > Can anyone else confirm: > > > > Receive: > "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! " > >> >> >> >> Web Dynpro client inspection >> >> >> >> >> So

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:29:33 -0400, /PhillipJones/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox Clicking on

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:05:16 -0500, /Jay Garcia/: On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: Start here: https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymous and select 'Register Now' in the left hand login box. FF 5 .. If I type in http://careers.amtrak.com I get https://careers.amtrak.com/irj/portal/anonymou

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox Clicking on the "Register Now" took me to https://careers.amtr

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro!" Web Dynpro client inspection Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 09.07.2011 23:11, NoOp wrote: --- Original Message --- > Can anyone else confirm: > > > > Receive: > "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! " > >> >> >> >> Web Dynpro client

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken > sniffing, IMO. All sniffing is broken, IMO. -- -bts -This post best viewed with Internet Explorer 4.0 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-se

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:11:36 +1000, /Daniel/: WFM SM 2.0.14 on Mandriva Linux 2009.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 not firefox Clicking on the "Register Now" took me to https://careers.amtrak.com/webdynpro/dispatcher

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro!" Web Dynpro client inspection Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

NoOp wrote: >"Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! " > I'm completely shocked. Their developers seem so talented. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://amtrak.com/ 374 Errors, 463 warning(s) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list sup

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

David E. Ross wrote: On 7/9/11 9:11 PM, NoOp wrote: Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro!" Web Dynpro client inspection Sorry, your brows

Re: Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

On 7/9/11 9:11 PM, NoOp wrote: > Can anyone else confirm: > > > > Receive: > "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! " > >> >> >> >> Web Dynpro client inspection >> >> >> >> >> So

Interesting... Neither FF or SM is allowed on this Amtrak page

Can anyone else confirm: Receive: "Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dynpro! " > > > > Web Dynpro client inspection > > > > > Sorry, your browser/program is not supported by Web Dy