Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
orm of compression. The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. [Try again] -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Connie
On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my elderly version of SM. I'll have to set up my test machine to see if I get the same problems as others are experiencing with the newer versions of SM. -- Co

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Hartmut Figge
Paul B. Gallagher: >IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? > > > >Content Encoding Error WFM in SM 2.25a1. Hartmut ___ support-seam

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Jim Taylor
lid or unsupported form of compression. The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. [Try again] Works for me in Windows 7 SeaMonkey 2.22 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Wind

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Connie wrote: > On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? > > Displays OK in Palemoon and my elderly version of SM. I'll have to set > up my test machine to see if I get the same problems as others are > experiencing with the newer v

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread WaltS
use it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. [Try again] WFM using Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; r

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Trane Francks
ecause it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. [Try again] WFM: OS X 10.7.5, SM 2.22. Site returns UT

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my elderly version of SM. I'll have to set up my test machine to see if I get the same problems as others are exper

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread WaltS
On 11/12/2013 12:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my elderly version of SM. I'll have to set up my test machine to

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
WaltS wrote: On 11/12/2013 12:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my elderly version of SM. I'll have to set up my te

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread hawker
On 11/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS wrote: On 11/12/2013 12:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread hawker
On 11/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS wrote: On 11/12/2013 12:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
hawker wrote: On 11/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have ABP 2.4, says "Ads were yesterday!" Double-checked custom filters, nothing relevant. My initial testing included clearing private data before reloading; spec includes cache and cookies (everything but browsing history and sa

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread hawker
On 11/12/2013 5:07 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: hawker wrote: On 11/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have ABP 2.4, says "Ads were yesterday!" Double-checked custom filters, nothing relevant. My initial testing included clearing private data before reloading; spec includes cache an