Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then prompts the question
Where can I find true 64 bit versions??
On Jan 11, 2:24 am, Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then
On 01/11/2010 02:24 AM, Daniel wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then prompts the question
On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US;
rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1
Note the x86_64...
That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine.
Robert Kaiser
Right, a 64bit
On 01/10/2010 04:02 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Revisiting this... regarding the lack of 64bit build on linux.
Decent Linux distributions offer them, no need for us to do so.
Why is it that the 'nightly' builds of SeaMonkey generally include a
64bit build, but the final
NoOp wrote:
On 01/10/2010 04:21 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US;
rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091206 SeaMonkey/2.0.1
Note the x86_64...
That's a 32bit build (i686) running on a 64bit (x86_64) machine.
Robert Kaiser
Right,
Daniel:
NoOp wrote:
Right, a 64bit build looks like this:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100108 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.3pre
Oh!! Well that then prompts the question
Where can I find true 64 bit versions??
Well, if you need such a
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7
as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically,
about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the
Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm hoping to
The 64-bit SM 2.0.1pre mentioned above, is working with 64-bit Linux, as
is the 64-bit Flash plugin.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 11/22/2009 04:03 AM, Edward wrote:
The 64-bit SM 2.0.1pre mentioned above, is working with 64-bit Linux, as
is the 64-bit Flash plugin.
Cool... now if we could just get an 'official' 2.0 build 64bit'ers would
be happy.
___
support-seamonkey
NoOp wrote:
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
...
As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
distributions?
+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?
Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of
course):
On 11/21/2009 03:47 PM, Edward wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
...
As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
distributions?
+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?
Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
...
As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
distributions?
+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?
Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of
course):
Subject: says it all. :)
I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7
as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically,
about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the
Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm hoping to
upgrade to.
As a secondary question, How about any 64
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7
as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically,
about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the
Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm hoping to
upgrade to.
As a secondary
15 matches
Mail list logo
