David E. Ross wrote:
That is a difference between 2.26.1 and 2.30. I have been using
Netscape Mozilla Suite SeaMonkey for about 20 years and have done
okay without the malware protection. I can do without it for the time
it takes to fix bug #1064639.
bugs get fixed? None of the ones I
is blocked
But http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html is NOT
blocked.
That is a difference between 2.26.1 and 2.30. I have been using
Netscape Mozilla Suite SeaMonkey for about 20 years and have
done okay without the malware protection. I can do without it
for the time it takes
David E. Ross wrote, On 30/10/2014 01:47:
The Web page http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites. Is
there a corresponding Web page for testing Gecko's protection against
sites containing malware?
I can see this
On 30/10/14 21:02, Ray_Net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote, On 30/10/2014 01:47:
The Web page http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites. Is
there a corresponding Web page for testing Gecko's protection against
sites
On 10/30/2014 3:02 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote, On 30/10/2014 01:47:
The Web page http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites. Is
there a corresponding Web page for testing Gecko's protection against
David E. Ross wrote:
On the left side of the Preferences window, select Privacy
Security. There are two checkboxes under Safe Browsing. The phishing
checkbox does indeed block
http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html for 2.26.1, but the
malware checkbox does not block
David E. Ross wrote, On 30/10/2014 16:19:
On 10/30/2014 3:02 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote, On 30/10/2014 01:47:
The Web page http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites. Is
there a corresponding Web page
/firefox/its-a-trap.html is blocked
But http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html is NOT blocked.
That is a difference between 2.26.1 and 2.30. I have been using
Netscape Mozilla Suite SeaMonkey for about 20 years and have done
okay without the malware protection. I can do without
true:
http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html is blocked
But http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html is NOT blocked.
That is a difference between 2.26.1 and 2.30. I have been using
Netscape Mozilla Suite SeaMonkey for about 20 years and have done
okay without the malware
for about 20 years and have done
okay without the malware protection. I can do without it for the time
it takes to fix bug #1064639.
Both are test page for phishing not for malware ...
2.26.1 should work for phishing and 2.30 should work for phishing and
malware.
So what ? Is the page http
Mozilla Suite SeaMonkey for about 20 years and have done
okay without the malware protection. I can do without it for the time
it takes to fix bug #1064639.
Both are test page for phishing not for malware ...
2.26.1 should work for phishing and 2.30 should work for phishing and
malware.
So what
is blocked
But http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html is NOT
blocked.
That is a difference between 2.26.1 and 2.30. I have been using
Netscape Mozilla Suite SeaMonkey for about 20 years and have
done okay without the malware protection. I can do without it
for the time it takes
is blocked
But http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html is NOT
blocked.
That is a difference between 2.26.1 and 2.30. I have been using
Netscape Mozilla Suite SeaMonkey for about 20 years and have
done okay without the malware protection. I can do without it
for the time it takes
The Web page http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites. Is
there a corresponding Web page for testing Gecko's protection against
sites containing malware?
--
David E. Ross
I am sticking with SeaMonkey 2.26.1 until
On 10/29/2014 08:47 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
The Web page http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites. Is
there a corresponding Web page for testing Gecko's protection against
sites containing malware?
are taken to
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-does-phishing-and-malware-protection-work,
which has a lot of good explanations.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/29/2014 08:47 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
The Web pagehttp://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites.
Interesting. When I open that link in Firefox34.0b4, I get a Reported
Web Forgery This web page
On 10/29/2014 10:51 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/29/2014 08:47 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
The Web pagehttp://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html provides
a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web sites.
Interesting. When I open that link in Firefox34.0b4,
In news:g-ednt5lmpw-f8zjnz2dnuu7-a-dn...@mozilla.org,
David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote:
The Web page http://www.itisatrap.org/firefox/its-a-trap.html
provides a test of Gecko's protection of users against phishing Web
sites. Is there a corresponding Web page for testing Gecko's
MCBastos myemail@example.invalid wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 30/01/2013 14:35, Rob told the world:
MCBastos myemail@example.invalid wrote:
So...
Antivirus: missed it
Other antivirus: about 75% chance of missing it.
Google Safe Browsing: missed it
ISP spam filter: flagged it as spam, but
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by
Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is
Rob wrote:
Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow
Rob wrote:
Yes. That is how it always is. You can never get total protection
from a system like this.
Even with a system that queries an online server, you have the
problem that you may visit a site that is not yet known to serve
malware, so the server says OK and you get infected anyway.
Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:
It is the same with virus scanners. That is why it is always better
to setup the system in such a way that software cannot be installed
or run as downloaded by the logged-in user. Use a separate account
for surfing and for administering the system
Interviewed by CNN on 30/01/2013 06:57, Daniel told the world:
So I could still be visiting phishing sites because my database could,
in part, be a week out of date!!
There's no guarantees of a complete database anywhere.
For instance:
I have just received a phishing e-mail, trying to
Interviewed by CNN on 30/01/2013 14:35, Rob told the world:
MCBastos myemail@example.invalid wrote:
So...
Antivirus: missed it
Other antivirus: about 75% chance of missing it.
Google Safe Browsing: missed it
ISP spam filter: flagged it as spam, but did nothing else. Not that it
helps much,
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected sites at a certain interval, then storing this list
in a local
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected sites at a certain interval, then storing this list
Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected sites at
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:47:18 +1100, Daniel wrote:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing
Ray_Net wrote:
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag
Ray_Net wrote:
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
2. A firefox guy is complaining about
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:02:16 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
I
WaltS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
2. A firefox guy
37 matches
Mail list logo
