Ray K wrote:
If I start from simply yahoo.com, scroll down, click a link and then
return, the scroll bar does return to it previous position. So it
appears to be be something odd about my.yahoo.com, but IE manages to
remember the previous scroll position.
Check your my.yahoo.com page refresh
Ray K schrieb:
Martin Feitag wrote:
pdf is handled by Adobe Reader plugin on that machine
That's why I tested with avi, too.
In both cases (wmv & avi) a window with mailbox:///xx is being
opened.
Whilst avi is being opened by VLC, wmv is opened by WMP.
The difference is: VLC opens and plays
If anyone knows how to disable internal handling of a specific filetype
in SM1.1.x, let me know anyway please...
doh! found npdsplay.dll
nevermind
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/li
Ray K wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
pdf is handled by Adobe Reader plugin on that machine
That's why I tested with avi, too.
In both cases (wmv & avi) a window with mailbox:///xx is being
opened.
Whilst avi is being opened by VLC, wmv is opened by WMP.
The difference is: VLC opens and plays
Martin Feitag wrote:
pdf is handled by Adobe Reader plugin on that machine
That's why I tested with avi, too.
In both cases (wmv & avi) a window with mailbox:///xx is being opened.
Whilst avi is being opened by VLC, wmv is opened by WMP.
The difference is: VLC opens and plays the file, WMP o
Moz Champion (Dan) schrieb:
Martin Feitag wrote:
Ray K schrieb:
One other immediate improvement. With SM, if I received an email with
a wmv attachment, and double-clicked it, it would not play unless all
SM windows were closed. This is not a problem with FF.
Really? You receive email with F
Martin Feitag wrote:
Ray K schrieb:
One other immediate improvement. With SM, if I received an email with
a wmv attachment, and double-clicked it, it would not play unless all
SM windows were closed. This is not a problem with FF.
Really? You receive email with FF (Fx actually)? Or are you t
Ray K schrieb:
One other immediate improvement. With SM, if I received an email with
a wmv attachment, and double-clicked it, it would not play unless all
SM windows were closed. This is not a problem with FF.
Really? You receive email with FF (Fx actually)? Or are you talking
about when you
One other immediate improvement. With SM, if I received an email with a
wmv attachment, and double-clicked it, it would not play unless all SM
windows were closed. This is not a problem with FF.
Really? You receive email with FF (Fx actually)? Or are you talking
about when you are logged into
Ray K wrote:
.
My home page is my.yahoo.com. With SM, when I click on a link, the new
page often - but certainly not every time - is delayed in opening. Task
Manager shows SM as Not Responding. At the bottom status line, I see
Read (or Waiting for) l.yimg.com. If I wait, sometimes up to a
On 02/23/2009 11:54 AM, Ray K wrote:
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>> Ray K wrote:
>>> My only real problem with SM is the slow browser.
>>
>> What do you find slow? We're using the same browser component as Firefox
>> 2 in SeaMonkey 1.1 and the same as Firefox 3.1 in SeaMonkey 2, so I
>> wonder how it
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray K wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray K wrote:
My only real problem with SM is the slow browser.
What do you find slow? We're using the same browser component as
Firefox 2 in SeaMonkey 1.1 and the same as Firefox 3.1 in SeaMonkey
2, so I wonder how it
Ray K wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray K wrote:
My only real problem with SM is the slow browser.
What do you find slow? We're using the same browser component as
Firefox 2 in SeaMonkey 1.1 and the same as Firefox 3.1 in SeaMonkey 2,
so I wonder how it can be different in speed.
Robert Kai
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray K wrote:
My only real problem with SM is the slow browser.
What do you find slow? We're using the same browser component as Firefox
2 in SeaMonkey 1.1 and the same as Firefox 3.1 in SeaMonkey 2, so I
wonder how it can be different in speed.
Robert Kaiser
Now that
It seems that, ironically, the FF/TB programs make it easy to import from Internet
Explorer, but not from the Mozilla "sister" product, SM.
I know! Annoying, isn't it. Every time you install a Moz family product
you wind up saying, "This would be SO much easier if I were using MS's
crap."
E
Ray K wrote:
I've been investigating the migrating/importing of bookmarks, address
books, mail, etc. to Firefox/Thunderbird from SeaMonkey. It seems that,
ironically, the FF/TB programs make it easy to import from Internet
Explorer, but not from the Mozilla "sister" product, SM.
To migrate my
Ray K wrote:
My only real problem with SM is the slow browser.
What do you find slow? We're using the same browser component as Firefox
2 in SeaMonkey 1.1 and the same as Firefox 3.1 in SeaMonkey 2, so I
wonder how it can be different in speed.
Robert Kaiser
I've been investigating the migrating/importing of bookmarks, address
books, mail, etc. to Firefox/Thunderbird from SeaMonkey. It seems that,
ironically, the FF/TB programs make it easy to import from Internet
Explorer, but not from the Mozilla "sister" product, SM.
To migrate my SM address bo
18 matches
Mail list logo
