MCBastos wrote:
> Interviewed by CNN on 30/01/2013 14:35, Rob told the world:
>> MCBastos wrote:
>>> So...
>>> Antivirus: missed it
>>> Other antivirus: about 75% chance of missing it.
>>> Google Safe Browsing: missed it
>>> ISP spam filter: flagged it as spam, but did nothing else. Not that it
>
Interviewed by CNN on 30/01/2013 14:35, Rob told the world:
> MCBastos wrote:
>> So...
>> Antivirus: missed it
>> Other antivirus: about 75% chance of missing it.
>> Google Safe Browsing: missed it
>> ISP spam filter: flagged it as spam, but did nothing else. Not that it
>> helps much, since this
MCBastos wrote:
> So...
> Antivirus: missed it
> Other antivirus: about 75% chance of missing it.
> Google Safe Browsing: missed it
> ISP spam filter: flagged it as spam, but did nothing else. Not that it
> helps much, since this particular filter has a high rate of false
> positives. One of the m
Interviewed by CNN on 30/01/2013 06:57, Daniel told the world:
> So I could still be visiting phishing sites because my database could,
> in part, be a week out of date!!
There's no guarantees of a complete database anywhere.
For instance:
I have just received a phishing e-mail, trying to indu
Daniel wrote:
>> It is the same with virus scanners. That is why it is always better
>> to setup the system in such a way that software cannot be installed
>> or run as downloaded by the logged-in user. Use a separate account
>> for surfing and for administering the system (installing software).
Rob wrote:
Yes. That is how it always is. You can never get total protection
from a system like this.
Even with a system that queries an online server, you have the
problem that you may visit a site that is not yet known to serve
malware, so the server says "OK" and you get infected anyway.
Rob wrote:
Daniel wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by download
Daniel wrote:
> MCBastos wrote:
>> Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
>>> Rob wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
> 2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
> could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature w
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:47:18 +1100, Daniel wrote:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected sites at a cert
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected sites
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:47:18 +1100, Daniel wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> 2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
>>> could this feature slow firefox.
>>
>> This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
>> of infected sites at a certain
Daniel wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> 2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
>>> could this feature slow firefox.
>>
>> This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
>> of infected sites at a certain interval, then storing this list
>>
Interviewed by CNN on 29/01/2013 10:47, Daniel told the world:
> Rob wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> 2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
>>> could this feature slow firefox.
>>
>> This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
>> of infected sites
Rob wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected sites at a certain interval, then storing this list
in a local file. The file is then
Ray_Net wrote:
> 2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages ..
> could this feature slow firefox.
This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list
of infected sites at a certain interval, then storing this list
in a local file. The file is then consulted
WaltS wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
2. A firefox guy is
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:02:16 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
> I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
>
> Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
> help keep you safe online.
>
> The questions are:
> 1. Would this featur
Ray_Net wrote:
> I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
>
> Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
> help keep you safe online.
>
> The questions are:
> 1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
Ray_Net wrote:
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag
I read here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/phishing-protection/
Firefox 3 or later contains built-in Phishing and Malware Protection to
help keep you safe online.
The questions are:
1. Would this feature also implemented in SM ?
2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing
20 matches
Mail list logo
