Ant wrote:
On 12/14/2009 8:56 PM PT, Ant typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
excluding a portion of their
On 12/20/2009 10:52 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
excluding a portion of their potential
On 12/21/2009 8:51 AM PT, chicagofan typed:
It looks like this issue is resolved. :)
It's working for me now too! Love it when sites respond to e-mail
requests! :)
:)
--
This isn't a war. It never was a war, any more than there's war between
man and ants. --artilleryman from H.G. Wells'
On 12/21/2009 9:48 AM, Ant wrote:
On 12/20/2009 10:52 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
On 12/21/2009 8:51 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 12/14/2009 8:56 PM PT, Ant typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1)
On 12/21/2009 11:37 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
excluding a portion of their potential
On 12/21/2009 11:35 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
excluding a portion of their potential
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/21/2009 8:51 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Ant wrote:
It looks like this issue is resolved. :)
It's working for me now too! Love it when sites respond to e-mail
requests! :)
bj
Yes. I wish the Vanguard Group (mutual funds) would be so
accommodating. They insist that
David E. Ross wrote:
/snip/
Yes. I wish the Vanguard Group (mutual funds) would be so
accommodating. They insist that Gecko is NOT Gecko and that they
support Firefox but not SeaMonkey. Worse, they even lock out SeaMonkey
when I spoof Firefox with SeaMonkey still in the UA string.
That's
On 12/21/2009 12:33 PM, Ant wrote:
On 12/21/2009 11:35 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
On 12/21/2009 3:05 PM, Lemuel Johnson wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
/snip/
Yes. I wish the Vanguard Group (mutual funds) would be so
accommodating. They insist that Gecko is NOT Gecko and that they
support Firefox but not SeaMonkey. Worse, they even lock out SeaMonkey
when I spoof Firefox
Ah. Now it's working.
Did you change something since last time?
I cleared my cache.
Ah. :)
--
It is not enough to be busy, so are the ants. The question is: what are
we busy about? --Henry David Thoreau
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
On 12/14/2009 8:56 PM PT, Ant typed:
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
excluding a portion of their potential customer
On 12/13/2009 11:03 PM, Ant wrote:
On 12/13/2009 3:17 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
On 12/13/2009 2:47 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/13/2009 5:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
On 12/14/2009 10:44 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
[snipped]
I got the same reply.
I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this
is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO
of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are
Hello.
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.redbox.com/
Line Number 203, Column 89:a
On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.redbox.com/
Line Number 203, Column 89:a
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.redbox.com/
Line Number 203, Column 89:a
href=http://www.redbox.com/Titles/AvailableTitles.aspx#GenregenreID=1020;
On 12/13/2009 2:47 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.redbox.com/
Line Number
On 12/13/2009 3:17 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.redbox.com/
Line Number 203, Column 89:a
On 12/13/2009 3:07 PM, Ant wrote:
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.redbox.com/
Line Number 203, Column 89:a
On 12/13/2009 3:45 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.redbox.com/
Line Number 203, Column 89:a
On 12/13/2009 4:22 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
On 12/13/2009 3:44 PM, Ant wrote:
On 12/13/2009 3:17 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
On 12/13/2009 5:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location:
On 12/13/2009 3:17 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
On 12/13/2009 2:47 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I
change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3?
I get an error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
26 matches
Mail list logo
