Martin Freitag wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus wrote:
http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html
Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128
bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do
Rufus schrieb:
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>> Rufus wrote:
>>> http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128
>>> bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do need
Rufus wrote:
...and is it true that SM uses strong encryption?
As I said, I'm no expert on that and so I can't tell. The only thing I
actually can tell you is that we're using the same code as Firefox 3.5,
so if that one does strong encryption there, we do it. If it doesn't, we
don't. I'm no
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Jens Hatlak schrieb:
Rufus wrote:
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring
of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0
now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength?
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Jens Hatlak schrieb:
Rufus wrote:
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring
of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0
now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong
128 bit?..I hop
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus wrote:
http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html
Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128
bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do need
to give it the Master to show pas
Keith Whaley wrote:
KaiRo - Robert Kaiser wrote:
Keith Whaley schrieb:
I have a feeling I might want to know a litle more detail about that
last sentence.
Would you kindly elaborate on "...we always encrypt, but default
generate a key from an empty master password."?
Well, I'm not an expert o
Rufus wrote:
http://luxsci.com/blog/master-password-encryption-in-firefox-and-thunderbird.html
Does this info actually hold for SM 2.0? And does SM 2.0 use strong 128
bit encryption when doing so? I have a Master set in 2.0, and I do need
to give it the Master to show passwords in the Manager.
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Jens Hatlak schrieb:
Rufus wrote:
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring
of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0
now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong
128 bit?..I hope...
No, it
KaiRo - Robert Kaiser wrote:
Keith Whaley schrieb:
I have a feeling I might want to know a litle more detail about that
last sentence.
Would you kindly elaborate on "...we always encrypt, but default
generate a key from an empty master password."?
Not on personal mail, if you want a reply, ple
Jens Hatlak schrieb:
Rufus wrote:
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring
of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0
now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong
128 bit?..I hope...
No, it doesn't encrypt by def
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring
of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0
now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength?
Strong 128 bit?..I hope...
No, it doesn't encrypt by d
Rufus wrote:
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of
sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now
encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128
bit?..I hope...
No, it doesn't encrypt by default, only obscure
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of
sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now
encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128
bit?..I hope...
...it would also be nice if the Password Quality meter that a
14 matches
Mail list logo