NoOp wrote:
On 08/04/2014 07:28 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote:
Daniel wrote:
No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made
no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people
claim no changes there. Very per
On 08/04/2014 07:28 PM, Larry S. wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>> On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote:
>>> Daniel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made
>>> no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people
>>> claim no changes there.
Larry S. wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Larry S. pounded out :
Daniel wrote:
On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could
deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I
Daniel wrote:
On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote:
Daniel wrote:
No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made
no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people
claim no changes there. Very perplexing!
Larry S.
Well, if it's not the Bank and it
Ed Mullen wrote:
Larry S. pounded out :
Daniel wrote:
On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could
deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles a
On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote:
Daniel wrote:
No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made
no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people
claim no changes there. Very perplexing!
Larry S.
Well, if it's not the Bank and it's not the scan
Larry S. pounded out :
Daniel wrote:
On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could
deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked grea
Daniel wrote:
On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half
On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. E
Trane Francks wrote:
On 6/22/14 12:33 PM +0900, Larry S. wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Geoff Welsh pounded out :
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could
deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great fo
Larry S. wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could
deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks)
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. E
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/21/2014 7:32 PM, Larry S. wrote:
SM is the way I access the credit union site, through which I then
access the scanning s/w. Nothing changed in the sequence except that I
upgraded SM to 2.26.
Larry S.
Is "Advertise Firefox compatibility" enabled or disabled?
Rufus wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever since then t
On 6/22/14 12:33 PM +0900, Larry S. wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Geoff Welsh pounded out :
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (o
On 6/21/2014 7:32 PM, Larry S. wrote:
> SM is the way I access the credit union site, through which I then
> access the scanning s/w. Nothing changed in the sequence except that I
> upgraded SM to 2.26.
>
> Larry S.
>
Is "Advertise Firefox compatibility" enabled or disabled?
Also, have you co
Ed Mullen wrote:
Geoff Welsh pounded out :
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.
Larry S. wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/21/2014 1:58 PM, Larry S. wrote [in part]:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Are there any other credit unions nearby? I mean credit unions
differ
Paul wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could
deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I
live 500 miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever since then the s
On 6/21/2014 1:58 PM, Larry S. wrote [in part]:
> Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
> checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
> miles away).
>
Are there any other credit unions nearby? I mean credit unions
different from the on
Geoff Welsh pounded out :
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever since the
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning process f
Larry S. wrote:
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning process fail
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit
checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500
miles away).
Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along
came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning process fails. Here's the
28 matches
Mail list logo