Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-08-31 Thread Larry S.
NoOp wrote: On 08/04/2014 07:28 PM, Larry S. wrote: Daniel wrote: On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote: Daniel wrote: No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people claim no changes there. Very per

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-08-05 Thread NoOp
On 08/04/2014 07:28 PM, Larry S. wrote: > Daniel wrote: >> On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote: >>> Daniel wrote: >> >> >> >>> No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made >>> no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people >>> claim no changes there.

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-08-04 Thread Geoff Welsh
Larry S. wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Larry S. pounded out : Daniel wrote: On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-08-04 Thread Larry S.
Daniel wrote: On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote: Daniel wrote: No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people claim no changes there. Very perplexing! Larry S. Well, if it's not the Bank and it

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-08-04 Thread Larry S.
Ed Mullen wrote: Larry S. pounded out : Daniel wrote: On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles a

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-07-08 Thread Daniel
On 08/07/14 00:55, Larry S. wrote: Daniel wrote: No, I've made no changes in add-ons. The bank claims that they've made no changes on their end. The scanner (hardware and s/w) support people claim no changes there. Very perplexing! Larry S. Well, if it's not the Bank and it's not the scan

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-07-07 Thread Ed Mullen
Larry S. pounded out : Daniel wrote: On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked grea

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-07-07 Thread Larry S.
Daniel wrote: On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-07-07 Thread Daniel
On 07/07/14 04:30, Larry S. wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-07-06 Thread Larry S.
WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. E

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-22 Thread Geoff Welsh
Trane Francks wrote: On 6/22/14 12:33 PM +0900, Larry S. wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Geoff Welsh pounded out : Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great fo

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-22 Thread Rufus
Larry S. wrote: Rufus wrote: Larry S. wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks)

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-22 Thread Larry S.
WaltS48 wrote: On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. E

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-22 Thread Larry S.
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/21/2014 7:32 PM, Larry S. wrote: SM is the way I access the credit union site, through which I then access the scanning s/w. Nothing changed in the sequence except that I upgraded SM to 2.26. Larry S. Is "Advertise Firefox compatibility" enabled or disabled?

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-22 Thread Larry S.
Rufus wrote: Larry S. wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-22 Thread WaltS48
On 06/21/2014 04:58 PM, Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever since then t

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Trane Francks
On 6/22/14 12:33 PM +0900, Larry S. wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Geoff Welsh pounded out : Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (o

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/21/2014 7:32 PM, Larry S. wrote: > SM is the way I access the credit union site, through which I then > access the scanning s/w. Nothing changed in the sequence except that I > upgraded SM to 2.26. > > Larry S. > Is "Advertise Firefox compatibility" enabled or disabled? Also, have you co

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Larry S.
Ed Mullen wrote: Geoff Welsh pounded out : Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Rufus
Larry S. wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Larry S.
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/21/2014 1:58 PM, Larry S. wrote [in part]: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Are there any other credit unions nearby? I mean credit unions differ

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Larry S.
Paul wrote: Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Larry S.
Geoff Welsh wrote: Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever since then the s

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/21/2014 1:58 PM, Larry S. wrote [in part]: > Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit > checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 > miles away). > Are there any other credit unions nearby? I mean credit unions different from the on

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Ed Mullen
Geoff Welsh pounded out : Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever since the

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Paul
Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning process f

Re: SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Geoff Welsh
Larry S. wrote: Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning process fail

SM 2.26 Affected My Scanner?

2014-06-21 Thread Larry S.
Some time ago my credit union started a process whereby I could deposit checks into my account by scanning (which was good, since I live 500 miles away). Worked great for a year and a half (over two dozen checks). Then along came SM 2.26. Ever since then the scanning process fails. Here's the