On 10/1/16, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 10/01/2016 07:21 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> On 9/30/2016 10:57 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
>>> On 9/30/2016 at 7:49 AM, Richard Owlett's prodigious digits fired off:
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400
On 10/1/2016 10:09 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/01/2016 07:21 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 9/30/2016 10:57 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/30/2016 at 7:49 AM, Richard Owlett's prodigious digits fired
off:
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
On 10/01/2016 07:21 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 9/30/2016 10:57 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/30/2016 at 7:49 AM, Richard Owlett's prodigious digits fired
off:
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
That's an imperfect subject line to sa
On 10/1/2016 at 7:21 AM, Richard Owlett's prodigious digits fired off:
On 9/30/2016 10:57 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/30/2016 at 7:49 AM, Richard Owlett's prodigious digits fired
off:
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
That's an imp
On 9/30/2016 10:57 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/30/2016 at 7:49 AM, Richard Owlett's prodigious digits fired
off:
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
Does SeaMonkey have a specificatio
On 9/30/2016 at 7:49 AM, Richard Owlett's prodigious digits fired off:
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the
"Feature List" a
On 27/09/2016 2:10 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the "Feature
List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ?
The "World Wide Web Consortium" has test suites
[http://validator.w3.org/]
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the
"Feature List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ?
That list is more co
On 9/29/2016 1:31 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
html5 support has improved a lot between 2.40 and current 2.46
which hopefully arrives soon. SeaMonkey should support all
standard html5 features Firefox support so any current website
which supports Firefox should work in SeaMonkey. Just make sure
html5 support has improved a lot between 2.40 and current 2.46 which
hopefully arrives soon. SeaMonkey should support all standard html5
features Firefox support so any current website which supports Firefox
should work in SeaMonkey. Just make sure to cut back on the Javascript
and try to avoid
On 9/28/2016 10:30 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 9/27/2016 2:10 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the
"Feature
List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ?
The "World Wide Web Consortium" has t
On 9/27/2016 2:10 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the "Feature
List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ?
The "World Wide Web Consortium" has test suites
[http://validator.w3.org/] t
On 9/27/2016 7:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
[snip]
Background: Our Pastor wishes the church to have a WEB presence -
including the availability of sermons. I date from dial-up era
when much audio was "download then play". Streaming was availab
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-27 14:10 (UTC-0400):
> That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
> Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the
> "Feature List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ?
That list is more concerned with UI features than compatibi
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:10:31 -0500, Richard Owlett
wrote:
>That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
>Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the
>"Feature List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ?
>
>The "World Wide Web Consortium" has test suites
>[http:
That's an imperfect subject line to say the least.
Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the
"Feature List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ?
The "World Wide Web Consortium" has test suites
[http://validator.w3.org/] to demonstrate compliance of a WEB
page wi
16 matches
Mail list logo
