David H. Durgee composed on 2017-12-07 13:11 (UTC-0500):
> Problem is now solved. Someone over on mint forums pointed me to the
> theme settings that were working for him and I tried changing my theme
> settings to match his. The problem went away. In particular changing
> the setting for co
EE wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhib
David H. Durgee wrote:
I just thought of one other test, so I opened the test page in Firefox
57.0.1 here and I see the exact same behavior! That may give me another
place to check, as there are more Firefox users that SeaMonkey.
Is there a newsgroup for Firefox support? That would probab
David H. Durgee composed on 2017-12-06 21:13 (UTC-0500):
> I just thought of one other test, so I opened the test page in Firefox
> 57.0.1 here and I see the exact same behavior! That may give me another
> place to check, as there are more Firefox users that SeaMonkey.
> Is there a newsgroup f
Felix Miata wrote:
David H. Durgee composed on 2017-12-06 14:32 (UTC-0500):
I do have a GTK3 customization file of my own to deal with the missing
scroll steppers as you do. Is there an override to add here as well
that will address the invisible checkbox/radio button problem?
Ultimately tha
David H. Durgee composed on 2017-12-06 14:32 (UTC-0500):
> I do have a GTK3 customization file of my own to deal with the missing
> scroll steppers as you do. Is there an override to add here as well
> that will address the invisible checkbox/radio button problem?
Ultimately that c
David H. Durgee wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Curiouser and curiouser, I tried this test URL on SM 2.49.1 on another
system with the little monkey theme and THERE I see the boxes and
radio buttons. So it appears specific to this instance of the
browser. I am going to try a browser restart an
David H. Durgee wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the pro
David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the problem at the line labelled "Profession" where
there are invisible check boxes that I can tick for both choices.
Felix Miata wrote:
David H. Durgee composed on 2017-12-06 10:54 (UTC-0500):
David H. Durgee wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem an
David H. Durgee composed on 2017-12-06 10:54 (UTC-0500):
> David H. Durgee wrote:
>> David H. Durgee wrote:
>>> Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>> David H. Durgee wrote:
>>> I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem a
On 12/6/17 10:54 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem
and
found this one:
ht
David H. Durgee wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
Th
David H. Durgee wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the pro
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the problem at the line labelle
David H. Durgee wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the problem at the line labelled "Profession" where
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the problem at the line labelled "Profession" where
there are invisible che
On 12/06/2017 08:01 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the problem at the line labelled "Profession" where
there are invisible check boxes that I can tic
I took a look around to find a public page exhibiting the problem and
found this one:
http://toolsqa.com/automation-practice-form/
This form exhibits the problem at the line labelled "Profession" where
there are invisible check boxes that I can tick for both choices.
This form also demonstra
There is a problem with dropmarkers and gtk3. Width is only 1 pixel .
Can usually be seen in the location bar with the history drop down menu.
Not aware of any problems with checkboxes but I can test it if you find
a public form with this problem.
FRG
David H. Durgee wrote:
I am encountering a
I am encountering a new problem here with SM 2.49.1 on Linux Mint 18.2
x64 that may be a bug. I am finding cases where a form is being
presented using check boxes and they are invisible! An example of this
is the Medicare plan search page. When the results are ready for
presentation you are
21 matches
Mail list logo
