Just curious, is there a planned timeline for the next release of
Seamonkey 2.x?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
mcjathan wrote:
Just curious, is there a planned timeline for the next release of
Seamonkey 2.x?
No. It will be released when it's ready. For 2.1, we probably will
target next summer, but nothing is sure at this point.
Of course, 2.0.x updates will come roughly every 6-8 weeks, in sync with
On 12/2/2009 8:13 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> mcjathan wrote:
>> Just curious, is there a planned timeline for the next release of
>> Seamonkey 2.x?
>
> No. It will be released when it's ready. For 2.1, we probably will
> target next summer, but nothing is sure at this point.
>
> Of course, 2.0.x
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/2/2009 8:13 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Of course, 2.0.x updates will come roughly every 6-8 weeks, in sync with
the Firefox 3.5.x updates, the next one is 2.0.1 and scheduled for
December 15 or 16.
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/2/2009 8:13 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Of course, 2.0.x updates will come roughly every 6-8 weeks, in sync with
the Firefox 3.5.x updates, the next one is 2.0.1 and scheduled for
December 15 or 16.
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? W
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only the already fixed in current nightlies will
be fixed.
The answer is YES
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only the already fixed in current nightlies will
be fixe
Ray_Net a écrit :
Are you saying that "ALL" bugs are fixed ? Unbelievable !
No, he's saying that they will be fixed.
S.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 12/4/2009 7:47 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> For the question:
>>> Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
>>> other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
>>> in Gecko for Firefox?
>>> The answer is NO ..
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only the already fixed in current nightl
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only the already fixed in current nightl
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only the already fixed in
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
For the question:
Will any bugs pecurliar to SeaMonkey be fixed? Will any bugs be fixed
other than security bugs? Will any bugs be fixed other than those
fixed
in Gecko for Firefox?
The answer is NO only th
Daniel:
>Ray_Net wrote:
>> The problem is that i have misunderstod "will be fixed" as "is fixed".
>> Apologies about this issue due to the fact that english is not my mother
>> language :-)
>
>No worries, then, Ray.
And i have reduced the number of my postings to avoid misunderstandings.
*g*
Ha
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Ray_Net wrote:
The problem is that i have misunderstod "will be fixed" as "is fixed".
Apologies about this issue due to the fact that english is not my mother
language :-)
No worries, then, Ray.
And i have reduced the number of my postings to avoid misundersta
Daniel:
>Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> And i have reduced the number of my postings to avoid misunderstandings.
>> *g*
>
>If your advise is the right advise, Hartmut, it needs to be sent!!
I do so if i can answer with a link or an entry into user.js. Not much
wording necessary in such case. :)
>ju
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:13:07 -0600, /Robert Kaiser/:
mcjathan wrote:
Just curious, is there a planned timeline for the next release of
Seamonkey 2.x?
No. It will be released when it's ready. For 2.1, we probably will
target next summer, but nothing is sure at this point.
Of course, 2.0.x update
Stanimir Stamenkov schrieb:
What Gecko version SeaMonkey 2.1 is planned to be based on - Gecko 1.9.3
(Firefox 3.7), or? Will there be a Gecko 1.9.2 (Firefox 3.6) based version?
AFAIK the current 2.1a1pre are based on Gecko1.9.2
regards
Martin
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mai
Martin Freitag:
>AFAIK the current 2.1a1pre are based on Gecko1.9.2
Look at my header. ;)
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Hartmut Figge schrieb:
Martin Freitag:
AFAIK the current 2.1a1pre are based on Gecko1.9.2
Look at my header. ;)
Damn! ;-P
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii
___
suppor
Stanimir Stamenkov schrieb:
What Gecko version SeaMonkey 2.1 is planned to be based on - Gecko 1.9.3
(Firefox 3.7), or? Will there be a Gecko 1.9.2 (Firefox 3.6) based version?
This is not completely decided yet. Current nightlies are based on
1.9.3-targeted code, and I lean towards doing 2.1
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Difficult. In the above sentence, should it be 'wording' or 'words' or
something else? *g*
Wording: how it is said.
Words: plural of word
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
And i have reduced the number of my postings to avoid misunderstandings.
*g*
If your advise is the right advise, Hartmut, it needs to be sent!!
I do so if i can answer with a link or an entry into user.js. Not much
wording necessary in such
23 matches
Mail list logo