Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding irritating with the new version.
First
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding irritating with the
On 6/19/11 7:40 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
>
> Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
> has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
> core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
>
> However, there are two thing
PhillipJones wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding
Sridhar Ayengar schrieb:
Second, I don't like the new scrolling tab bar. I prefer the old
behavior where the tabs just become unreadably small. I tend not to pay
attention to what the tabs read. Rather, I memorize the *order* of my
tabs. In this case, being able to see, at a glance, *how many* ta
Ed Mullen a écrit :
PhillipJones wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are t
PhillipJones wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding
On 6/20/2011 5:52 PM PT, Paul Bergsagel typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html, or a differ
Ant wrote:
On 6/20/2011 5:52 PM PT, Paul Bergsagel typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html, o
On 6/21/2011 6:12 PM PT, Paul Bergsagel typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html, or a differen
Ant a écrit :
On 6/21/2011 6:12 PM PT, Paul Bergsagel typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html
On 6/21/2011 10:21 PM PT, cyberzen typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi
from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html, or a different one
12 matches
Mail list logo