On 2011-07-29, Dave Malham wrote:
Can I ask a question? Where are the ambisonic high priestesses? Where
have you hidden then? :-)
Like I would tell you'll.
--
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
_
On 2011-07-28, Eric Benjamin wrote:
One thing that I learned from those is that it's difficult to get high
quality audio from a computer unless you have the converters be remote
from the computer itself.
I don't know if this would pan out in practice, but I think it might...
While outboard D
On 2011-07-27, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
This is very subjective, but yes, I have the impression it is better.
Also the speakers tend to disappear as being the sources of the sound
and there is less interaction from the room - the sensation that the
sound is 'just there' is stronger than for straig
Hi everyone,
Thanks for all the brilliant feedback, and especially Michael and Eric for
their very detailed thoughts. I've got a lot to think about, but, for my needs,
it seems the expense of an 8-channel periphonic system will mostly depend on
the quality of speakers (and their mounting). My a
This other module (less than $30) is limited to 16bit
but seems to work at 48Khz with 8 channels:
http://www.sabrent.com/category/audio/USB-SND8/
Umashankar have one.
--
Marc
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:17:57 -0400,
Hugh Pyle wrote :
> I have one of these, and it's cheap and works well. The biggest
