Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release: HTML5 test

2011-12-01 Thread Sampo Syreeni
On 2011-12-01, Martin Leese wrote: You could try using your own HTML5 page to offer one option at a time. If two of the three don't work then you will know. But in a sense it's a valid question at another level. Does HTML5 (in its various forms, mostly H.264 i.e. AAC) reliably fall back to s

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release: HTML5 test

2011-12-01 Thread etienne deleflie
Hi Mick, If you are talking about this page: http://soundofspace.com/static/test_html5.html then all feeds are 5.1 if you are hearing stereo it is your browser that has decided to interpret the 5.1 feed as stereo. Any settings for that would be browser side. But to find out which of the thr

Re: [Sursound] Great responses to my post--thanks!

2011-12-01 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:30:07AM -0800, Eric Carmichel wrote: > The post that said that Ambisonics resorts to some “psychoacoustic > trickery” was very well taken, and addresses one of my preliminary > concerns regarding first-order Ambisonics. This is true, in the same sense as it is for e.g.

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release: HTML5 test

2011-12-01 Thread Martin Leese
mick ritchie wrote: > Etienne - > > I can play back stereo from your player in firefox3 and Safari but > not 5.1 - my > 5.1 box doesnt see dolby digital just stereo. Is there any way of > telling which > feed my browser accesses? You could try using your own HTML5 page to offer one option at a

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release: HTML5 test

2011-12-01 Thread mick ritchie
Etienne - I can play back stereo from your player in firefox3 and Safari but not 5.1 - my 5.1 box doesnt see dolby digital just stereo. Is there any way of telling which feed my browser accesses? mick On 29 Nov 2011, at 23:51, etienne deleflie wrote: Hi Fabio, Worked fine with Safari a

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-12-01 Thread mick ritchie
Marinos - I havent a clue what a nitrate is but maybe kbs and i seem to remember my options in Apack being limited so i just went for the highest as ac3's are small On 29 Nov 2011, at 21:13, Marinos Koutsomichalis wrote: thx Mick I think I' ll go down the ac3 road - not shire however what