I think he missed the Soundfield ST450 as well, didn't he?:
http://www.soundfield.com/products/st450.php
Regards,
John
(Happy ST450 and TetraMic User)
On 24 Apr 2013, at 21:41, Martin Leese wrote:
> Eric missed only the Russian made Octava
___
Su
many thanks to many people.
- matt
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130424/e04041f2/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Su
Eric Benjamin wrote:
> Another 2 cents worth. For Ambisonic recording there are a few
> alternatives.
...
> And there are a number of home-built alternatives. An probably some
> others
I try to maintain a list of manufacturers in
Wikipedia at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundfield_mic#Externa
sursound/attachments/20130424/9befafb2/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
On 2013-04-24, Peter Lennox wrote:
It's only a tiny point, but Sampo, you said "... because our vertical
resolution is so bad..." Strictly, our perception in the vertical
plane isn't the same as in "elevation", except for the special case
where the head is kept still, not tilted.
Fully grant
It's only a tiny point, but Sampo, you said "... because our vertical
resolution is so bad..."
Strictly, our perception in the vertical plane isn't the same as in
"elevation", except for the special case where the head is kept still, not
tilted. 'In the wild', we do move and tilt our head, espe