Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Michael Chapman
a sphere, such as the commercially available Eigenmike: > http://www.mhacoustics.com/products > > > There are other methods. �It's still early days for this technology. > > Eric Benjamin > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > U

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Benjamin
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/1436acf9/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Joseph Anderson
; Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/99852949/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread David Pickett
At 18:12 22-11-13, Richard Furse wrote: >Yes - there basically aren't any problems applying the processing operations >to material that is only first order. Feeding first order material to a >third order decoder raises more subtle issues. I have obviously missed something. How does one record i

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:19:58AM -0800, Aaron Heller wrote: > I hate to contradict you, but my experience playing my first-order > recordings (e.g. Pulcinella, LvB 4th Sym, available on Ambisonia) on the > 2nd or 3rd order presets in Ambdec results in decoding errors. The most > obvious artifac

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Richard Furse
> Sursound@music.vt.edu >>>> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound >>>> ___ >>>> Sursound mailing list >>>> Sursound@music.vt.edu >>>> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailma

Re: [Sursound] Hector bird recording - SoundCloud

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Benjamin
und@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/fb208b96/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mai

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Aaron Heller
versity. > > > > These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University > > > > Dave Malham > > Honorary Fellow, Department of Music > > The University of York > > York YO10 5DD > > UK > > > > 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' > > -- next part -- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/201311 > > 22/d895072c/attachment.html> > > ___ > > Sursound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/0ef0c46f/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

[Sursound] 45J recordings - did they / do they exist?

2013-11-22 Thread Richard
was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/3b112ce6/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Richard Furse
Yes - there basically aren't any problems applying the processing operations to material that is only first order. Feeding first order material to a third order decoder raises more subtle issues. If you're working with first order material, we'd normally recommend you still work at third order wi

Re: [Sursound] Hector bird recording - SoundCloud

2013-11-22 Thread dw
Perhaps witchcraft needs some strange settings. For headhones - https://www.dropbox.com/s/iga71wluxfcb4i6/Untitled2.mp3 On 22/11/2013 14:21, dw wrote: On 21/11/2013 19:08, Aaron Heller wrote: I took the liberty of merging them into 4-channel files and putting them on my server, which might be

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread John Leonard
I've been trying these out and they're extremely good. Highly recommended. John On 21 Nov 2013, at 13:14, Richard Furse wrote: > Hi there! > > In case folk aren't aware, the TOA ("Third Order Ambisonic") VST plugins > from Blue Ripple Sound have been released, along with some other bits and >

Re: [Sursound] Hector bird recording - SoundCloud

2013-11-22 Thread dw
On 21/11/2013 19:08, Aaron Heller wrote: I took the liberty of merging them into 4-channel files and putting them on my server, which might be easier to access than the skydive (the UI was in Japanese for me, fortunately I recognized the character for 'down') http://ambisonics.dreamhosters.co

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Dave Malham
of Music The University of York York YO10 5DD UK 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/d895072c/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] how to read common loudspeaker format (CLF) file

2013-11-22 Thread Junfeng Li
Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/ef09f5b2/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] how to read common loudspeaker format (CLF) file

2013-11-22 Thread Bengt-Inge Dalenbäck
Dear Junfeng At 01:20 2013-11-22, you wrote: >Dear Martin, > >I sent one email to CLF group. Unfortunately, there is no any response. >Therefore, I try to look for someone who have some experience in using CLF >files. Junfeng, your mail was replied to Nov 11, the same day you requested the info,