On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 07:41:26PM +0530, umashankar manthravadi wrote:
> The next stage was taking these 40 x 4 irs and producing a small
> 4 x 4 matrix of filters to use with brahmavolver.
160 IRs to produce 16 values (per frequency) seems to me like giant
overkill. The information you get fro
see why what you’re doing around the
> Brahma mike makes good sense! I’d love to hear how this is getting on, and if
> we can help. Are the capsules behaving themselves in context (e.g. not
> collapsing too badly to mono)? Many thanks! Best wishes, --Rich
c.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140312/bd177975/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
t wishes,
>
> --Richard
>
>
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/m
Dear all
the University of Surrey, the University of Salford and the University of
Southampton, in collaboration with the BBC, have embarked in a new programme
grant “S3A: Future Spatial Audio for an Immersive Listener Experience at Home”,
supported by the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences
On 03/10/2014 11:50 PM, Steve Boardman wrote:
Hi J?rn (not sure what the character '?' is as it always displays
that way)
an o with double dot.
the way i approach it is: * keep the early reflection paths clean
for every speaker, like you would for stereo. no reflections < 10
ms is a good thin
