next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150424/92bd75e5/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mail
o/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> > edit account or options, view archives and so on.
> >
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150424/92bd75e5/attachment.h
On 2015-04-22, Peter Lennox wrote:
I'd be interested in any references indicating deleterious effects on
hearing of high amplitudes at LF, if anyone comes across any
No references from me, as usual, but there is a certain logic behind the
claim. First, because of the loudness sensitivity curv
On 2015-04-23, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
How can this be if there are no fundamentals in this range? (See my
list of piano keys/frequencies. Some instruments go down to about
30Hz. Organs can go even lower, but this is already one of the
non-typical cases)
That stuff is indeed there and mo
The question isn't whether 'music' has frequencies below 1/zillion Hz.
It's whether such content adds to the MUSIC.
This is the case ONLY with organs reproduced properly.
You can check this with DBLTs. The speaker that has come out top in every
single DBLT it has been in nearly 2 decades (som
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<
