Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Dave Malham
Malham Honorary Fellow, Department of Music The University of York York YO10 5DD UK 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160811/47

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Richard Furse wrote: > What I'm really hoping doesn't happen is that we change convention > and then some amazing new toy emerges using something different... Consider it the other way round: _your_ amazing toys will have their influence on others. Ciao

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46:30PM +0100, Dave Malham wrote: > Awww, come on, a bit of mental exercise is good for the soul! :-) :-) Agree with that. But having done that sort of mental exercise more than once, IMHO the only good reason to inflict it on others is to show that it's not very produc

Re: [Sursound] Merging impulse responces, is it workable?

2016-08-11 Thread Richard Furse
Yup, all good advice. Not a direct answer to the question, but a possibly relevant new convolution reverb approach: http://www.blueripplesound.com/story/new-toa-shaped-convolution-reverb Depending on how it's configured it can be a bit of a CPU hog, but worth it IMHO... --Richard > -Origina

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Richard Furse
I was about to say that this is the sort of thing you get right once and then never need to touch, but actually I did see a plugin out in the wild recently with the conversion wrong! On SN3D, my main worries are (a) losing compatibility with existing material/projects/kit and (b) it's SN3D, not N3

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Steven Boardman
+1 from me too. One standard makes it easier for everyone, Less confusing and less time consuming. How many conversions does one has to do, just to use different plugins in the same chain? I’ve been caught out a few times when checking rigs, only to realise the content has a different channel

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Politis Archontis
+1 for (S)N3D / ACN. To us newbies, as Fons mentioned :-), FuMa makes sense only for 1st-order, and then it is trivial to convert to the above if needed. Best, Archontis On Aug 10, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Richard Furse wrote: > Hi there! > > > > Blue Ripple Sound are wondering about changing thei

Re: [Sursound] Merging impulse responces, is it workable?

2016-08-11 Thread Politis Archontis
m > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160811/4e8d149d/attachment.html> > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt