On 2017-06-24, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
... In that scenario, the TetraMic recording was definitely
noisier, purely due to the additional gain required.
That doesn't make much sense.
I think as much as well.
Noise level (relative to signal) shouldn't increase with gain.
At least when
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 05:07:15PM +, Enda Bates wrote:
> ... In that scenario, the TetraMic recording was definitely
> noisier, purely due to the additional gain required.
That doesn't make much sense.
Noise level (relative to signal) shouldn't increase with gain.
If it does that means the
.
null
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20170624/190346c7/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
onversion
> plugin? The new filter sounds a lot better to my ears.
>
> e
>
>
> Steve
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20170624/d1167bc5/at
On 2017-06-24, Enda Bates wrote:
In terms of directional accuracy, our study did find the Ambeo to be
slightly more accurate, but with the difference in capsule spacing
that was expected.
I glanced at the post, but don't seem to remember. Sorry about that. But
I just wanted to make sure:
plugin?
The new filter sounds a lot better to my ears.
e
Steve
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20170624/d1167bc5/attachment.h
