Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-24 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Stefan Schreiber wrote: Markus Noisternig wrote: Dear Richard and Sursounders, The AES-X212 "Spatial acoustic data file format" standardizes a file format to exchange HRTF data. The format is designed to be extendable to represent any space-related data, such as spatial room impulse respons

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-24 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Markus Noisternig wrote: Dear Richard and Sursounders, The AES-X212 "Spatial acoustic data file format" standardizes a file format to exchange HRTF data. The format is designed to be extendable to represent any space-related data, such as spatial room impulse responses (SRIR) measured with m

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-24 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Martin Leese wrote: Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote: Is there a way to get a personalized HRTF (or even one near mine) with out spending many hundreds of the coins of your choice or travelling to a distant destination? No but, if the Microsoft stuff works out, there might be. Is there a

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-23 Thread Markus Noisternig
Dear Richard and Sursounders, The AES-X212 "Spatial acoustic data file format" standardizes a file format to exchange HRTF data. The format is designed to be extendable to represent any space-related data, such as spatial room impulse responses (SRIR) measured with multichannel microphone and

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-23 Thread Richard Dobson
I think the AES already has a project to define a file format for htrfs; when I get home I can find the project code. Richard Dobson Sent from my iPhone On 23 Jun 2014, at 17:43, Martin Leese wrote: > Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote: > >> Is there a way to get a personalized HRTF (or even one near

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-23 Thread Martin Leese
Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote: > Is there a way to get a personalized HRTF (or even one near mine) with out > spending many hundreds of the coins of your choice or travelling to a > distant destination? No but, if the Microsoft stuff works out, there might be. > Is there a "standard format" for HRTFS t

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-23 Thread Bo-Erik Sandholm
2014 23:19 To: Michael Chapman; Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] And now for something different... I have to be fair - this was my colleague Tony Tew from the Department of Electronics that was in charge of this... Dave On 21 June 2014 21:12, Michael Chapman wrote:

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-22 Thread Dave Malham
Potentially very useful indeed, especially if they make it at least reasonably open. For my own part, my "oh for crying out loud" rant should have been more obviously aimed at the tone of the press release which was what I was really upset by. However, please note I reserve the right to get annoy

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-22 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Martin Leese wrote: Dave Malham wrote: Oh, for cryin' out loud. Makes you want to weep - Microsoft reinventing again what's already been done and (most of) the rest of the world believing they're the originators... I am no fan of Microsoft, but this seems a little harsh. Quickly pro

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-21 Thread Dave Malham
I have to be fair - this was my colleague Tony Tew from the Department of Electronics that was in charge of this... Dave On 21 June 2014 21:12, Michael Chapman wrote: > > Dave Malham wrote: > > > >> Oh, for cryin' out loud. Makes you want to weep - Microsoft reinventing > >> again what's

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-21 Thread Michael Chapman
> Dave Malham wrote: > >> Oh, for cryin' out loud. Makes you want to weep - Microsoft reinventing >> again what's already been done and (most of) the rest of the world >> believing they're the originators... > > I am no fan of Microsoft, but this seems a little > harsh. Quickly producing an approx

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-21 Thread Martin Leese
Dave Malham wrote: > Oh, for cryin' out loud. Makes you want to weep - Microsoft reinventing > again what's already been done and (most of) the rest of the world > believing they're the originators... I am no fan of Microsoft, but this seems a little harsh. Quickly producing an approximate perso

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-21 Thread Michael Chapman
> Sad but true... > Sorry, but I must take issue, calling Microsoft "sad" is akin to calling a genocide 'unfortunate' !!! > On 6/21/14, 12:08 AM, Dave Malham wrote: >> Oh, for cryin' out loud. Makes you want to weep - Microsoft reinventing >> again what's already been done and (most of) the rest

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-21 Thread Kan Kaban
Sad but true... On 6/21/14, 12:08 AM, Dave Malham wrote: Oh, for cryin' out loud. Makes you want to weep - Microsoft reinventing again what's already been done and (most of) the rest of the world believing they're the originators... Dave On 20 June 2014 17:52, David Pickett wrote: htt

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-20 Thread Dave Malham
Oh, for cryin' out loud. Makes you want to weep - Microsoft reinventing again what's already been done and (most of) the rest of the world believing they're the originators... Dave On 20 June 2014 17:52, David Pickett wrote: > http://www.technologyreview.com/news/527826/microsofts-3- > d-a

[Sursound] And now for something different...

2014-06-20 Thread David Pickett
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/527826/microsofts-3-d-audio-gives-virtual-objects-a-voice/ David ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, vi