Didn't Lauridsen propose and experiment with
stereo playback done this way--with a mono signal
in the center and a diffference signal produced by a edgeon mounted
dipole?
Robert
On Wed, 22 May 2013, J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
Hi Ray,
On 05/22/2013 01:24 AM, revery wrote:
Hello j?rn,
Thinking
Hi Ray,
On 05/22/2013 01:24 AM, revery wrote:
Hello jörn,
Thinking about what you say here, is this working by having pure M
from the front and S from 90 degrees to the side, effectively
'mixing' the M S signals in the air as they reach the ears/brain?
(Maybe I'm thinking about this too much, m
Hello jörn,
Thinking about what you say here, is this working by having pure M from the
front and S from 90 degrees to the side, effectively 'mixing' the M S signals
in the air as they reach the ears/brain? (Maybe I'm thinking about this too
much, my brain is hurting.)
If so, is there signific
On 05/08/2013 07:38 AM, revery wrote:
I have a question on the decoding MS recordings, for instance just 2 channel,
by using an ambisonic decoder to create the stereo.
Am I off the track here? Would an elaborate MS to ambisonic converter be
required, or maybe just a level change between M and S
On May 14, 2013, at 6:00 PM, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote:
>
> From: revery
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Naive question on MS and Ambisonics
> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Thank you all for y
On May 12, 2013, at 6:00 PM, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote:
> From: revery
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Naive question on MS and Ambisonics
> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Thank you all for your
Thank you all for your replies. I can see now that my questions was not
expressed at all well and somewhat sparsely, so thanks for the efforts made to
respond, they have been very helpful.
Originally I was intrigued that in discussions on Ambisonics, Mid-Side doesn't
seem to feature much even t
On 2013-05-09, Justin Bennett wrote:
You can always record an omni along with your MS mic and get
horizontal B-format!
only, of course, if you are using 2x figure-of-8 mics, or a double MS
set up.
Theoretically it works with a pair of cardioids (XY; call them a and b),
the Blumlein pair (c
revery wrote:
> I have a question on the decoding MS recordings, for instance just 2
> channel, by using an ambisonic decoder to create the stereo.
> Am I off the track here? Would an elaborate MS to ambisonic converter be
> required, or maybe just a level change between M and S?
> My purpose is
>
> You can always record an omni along with
> your MS mic and get horizontal B-format!
only, of course, if you are using 2x figure-of-8 mics,
or a double MS set up. I was a bit quick with the "send" button there.
best, Justin
Justin Bennett
jus...@justinbennett.nl
www.justinbennett.nl
http:
> revery wrote:
>
>> I have a question on the decoding MS recordings, for instance just 2
>> channel, by using an ambisonic decoder to create the stereo.
>> Am I off the track here? Would an elaborate MS to ambisonic converter be
>> required, or maybe just a level change between M and S?
>> My pu
Helmut Wittek gave a paper Tonmeistertagung 2006 that discusses the
relationship between Schoeps Double-MS and Ambisonic B-format.
http://hauptmikrofon.de/HW/TMT2006_Wittek_DoubleMS_neutral.pdf
English translation here:
http://www.schoeps.de/documents/SCHOEPS_Double_MS_paper_E_2010.pdf
---
[augustineleu...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 May 2013 09:41
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Naive question on MS and Ambisonics
I dont understand the question either ! Does MS stand for mono/stereo ? Not
naive enough for my liking
On 8 May 2013 20:31, Martin Leese wrote
I dont understand the question either ! Does MS stand for mono/stereo ? Not
naive enough for my liking
On 8 May 2013 20:31, Martin Leese wrote:
> revery wrote:
>
> > I have a question on the decoding MS recordings, for instance just 2
> > channel, by using an ambisonic decoder to create th
revery wrote:
> I have a question on the decoding MS recordings, for instance just 2
> channel, by using an ambisonic decoder to create the stereo.
> Am I off the track here? Would an elaborate MS to ambisonic converter be
> required, or maybe just a level change between M and S?
> My purpose is t
I have a question on the decoding MS recordings, for instance just 2 channel,
by using an ambisonic decoder to create the stereo.
Am I off the track here? Would an elaborate MS to ambisonic converter be
required, or maybe just a level change between M and S?
My purpose is to be able use say Har
16 matches
Mail list logo
