Hi,
This patch will lock the VT that is active just after splash is
initialized and release it just before the splash system is stopped.
I haven't tested it extensively with bootsplash.org, but it seems to
work with that (in vmware) too.
Comments?
Index: suspend.c
==
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:26:45 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 September 2006 17:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:10:18 +0200
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > -(a) [optional] If you want to use the compression an
On Thursday, 14 September 2006 17:22, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:10:18 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > -(a) [optional] If you want to use the compression and/or encryption
> > > -capabilities of the suspend tools and you have installed the necessary
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:10:18 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -(a) [optional] If you want to use the compression and/or encryption
> > -capabilities of the suspend tools and you have installed the necessary
> > -packages referred to in subsection 2), you need to set
> > -CO
On Thursday, 14 September 2006 16:57, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:29:34 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu 2006-09-14 13:22:29, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:55:06 +0200
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Thu 2006-09-14 16:57:34, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:29:34 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu 2006-09-14 13:22:29, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:55:06 +0200
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> >
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:29:34 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 2006-09-14 13:22:29, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:55:06 +0200
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thursday, 14 September 2006 11:04, Pavel Machek wrot
On Thu 2006-09-14 13:22:29, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:55:06 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, 14 September 2006 11:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought Rafael is going to apply them... he has CVS wri
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:55:06 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 14 September 2006 11:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > I thought Rafael is going to apply them... he has CVS write access,
> > too. Or just send me a patch (one, I'm lazy) and a ch
Hi,
On Thursday, 14 September 2006 12:06, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:47:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > From: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > diff --exclude='.*' --exclude='*o' -ruNp
> > > /usr/src/linux/kernel/power/power.h
> > > linux-2.
Hi,
On Thursday, 14 September 2006 11:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > Well, we can do without these ioctls, I think.
> > > > >
> > > > > The patch looks good.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > I've played around a bit with different ioctls to lock against VT
> > > > switching,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:12:06AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> I've played around a bit with different ioctls to lock against VT
> switching, but that would IMHO be to complicated to worth the trouble.
> If people are bitten by this I can have another look at it, but most
> probably they will j
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:47:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > diff --exclude='.*' --exclude='*o' -ruNp
> > /usr/src/linux/kernel/power/power.h linux-2.6.18-rc6-2/kernel/power/power.h
> > --- /usr/src/linux/kernel/power/power.h
On Wed 13. Sep - 23:02:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 September 2006 11:02, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Finally, support for splashy itself.
>
> All of the patches in the series look good to me and I assume they have been
> tested. ;-)
>
> I think we can apply them and if they cause an
Hi!
> > > > Well, we can do without these ioctls, I think.
> > > >
> > > > The patch looks good.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > I've played around a bit with different ioctls to lock against VT
> > > switching, but that would IMHO be to complicated to worth the trouble.
> > > If people are bit
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:34:38 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Also it removes the ioctls around freeze(), IIRC this is an attempt
> > > > to lock against VT-switching. The way it is implemented now will
> > > > make s2disk switch away from the splash VT. IMHO it is
Hi!
> > > Also it removes the ioctls around freeze(), IIRC this is an attempt
> > > to lock against VT-switching. The way it is implemented now will
> > > make s2disk switch away from the splash VT. IMHO it is unneeded.
> >
> > Well, we can do without these ioctls, I think.
> >
> > The patch l
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:52:26 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, 12 September 2006 11:02, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> >
> > Also it removes the ioctls around freeze(), IIRC this is an attempt
> > to lock against VT-switching. The way it is implemented now will
18 matches
Mail list logo
