Re: [Suspend-devel] Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

2007-05-03 Thread Holger Macht
On Thu 03. May - 18:45:10, David Zeuthen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 00:12 +0200, Holger Macht wrote: > > Still, what we definitely want is _one single_ architecture independent > > whitelist. And there is where hal-info comes in which is easy to update > > for distributions etc. IMHO. I'm seein

Re: [Suspend-devel] Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

2007-05-03 Thread David Zeuthen
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 00:12 +0200, Holger Macht wrote: > Still, what we definitely want is _one single_ architecture independent > whitelist. And there is where hal-info comes in which is easy to update > for distributions etc. IMHO. I'm seeing this difficulty with the two > different lists for qui

Re: [Suspend-devel] Patch: remove incorrect vbestate_restore quirk for some laptops

2007-05-03 Thread David Zeuthen
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:24 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote: > On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 13:40 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > > > Ugh.. Hope I didn't start a flamewar here... I'm just trying to > > > clarify > > > that mixing fb and X drivers is problemat

Re: [Suspend-devel] Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

2007-05-03 Thread Holger Macht
On Fri 04. May - 00:12:24, Holger Macht wrote: > On Thu 03. May - 21:55:14, Danny Kukawka wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:40 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote: > > > > The point is not using s2ram or that s2ram would break. The point is > > > > t

Re: [Suspend-devel] Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

2007-05-03 Thread Holger Macht
On Thu 03. May - 21:55:14, Danny Kukawka wrote: > On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:40 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote: > > > The point is not using s2ram or that s2ram would break. The point is that > > > removing the quirk would break resume if you suspend v

Re: [Suspend-devel] Patch: remove incorrect vbestate_restore quirk for some laptops

2007-05-03 Thread Danny Kukawka
On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 13:40 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > > Ugh.. Hope I didn't start a flamewar here... I'm just trying to > > clarify > > that mixing fb and X drivers is problematic. Let's go continue > > collecting quirks and make hal-info make

Re: [Suspend-devel] Patch: remove incorrect vbestate_restore quirk for some laptops

2007-05-03 Thread Danny Kukawka
I add suspend-devel to CC, I think they can tell more, they have all the knowledge about s2ram and the needed quirks. You can find this thread here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.hal/8199 And also this thread would be interesting (and wait maybe for comments): http://thread.gman

Re: [Suspend-devel] Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

2007-05-03 Thread Danny Kukawka
On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:40 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote: > > The point is not using s2ram or that s2ram would break. The point is that > > removing the quirk would break resume if you suspend via init=/bin/bash > > (the testcase) or console. This ch

[Suspend-devel] s2ram

2007-05-03 Thread Sven Foerster
s2ram works fine on my maschine but it is on the blacklist This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = "Acer, inc." sys_product = "TravelMate C200 " sys_version = "Not Applicable" bios_version = "3A14" See http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram for details. how can i get it on the w