On Fri 04. May - 00:12:24, Holger Macht wrote: > On Thu 03. May - 21:55:14, Danny Kukawka wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:40 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote: > > > > The point is not using s2ram or that s2ram would break. The point is > > > > that > > > > removing the quirk would break resume if you suspend via init=/bin/bash > > > > (the testcase) or console. This change only work under X. All this has > > > > nothing to do with s2ram, only with the suspend itself. > > > > > > I'll rephrase my questions > > > > > > 1. Is it correct than s2ram has it's own list of quirks? > > > > Currently yes > > To be a little bit pernickety, actually HAL is using its own list no one > else is using AFAIK ;-) Every distro I know of currently uses the s2ram > internal one.
Ok, just reading a mail from Tim Dijkstra where he explains that debian is preferring the hal whitelist in first place if available and just uses the s2ram whitelist as a fallback. So I'm wrong here. Regards, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel