Re: [Suspend-devel] wrong title, T61 works with -a1

2007-07-29 Thread Joe Nahmias
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:00:42PM +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > But "-a3" works, too? Then i'd take that one, since most thinkpads > work well with "-a 3" and i'd like to avoid too many special cases. Yes, -a3 works as well. Verified both in console and X. Thanks, --Joe -

[Suspend-devel] Dell Inspiron E1705 / s2ram

2007-07-29 Thread Justin Ferguson
This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = "Dell Inc." sys_product = "MP061 " sys_version = "" bios_version = "A08" s2ram -f (no other arguments) works like a charm on this machine; can we get it added to the whitelist?

[Suspend-devel] Entry into S2ram database

2007-07-29 Thread Alexandr Kara
Hello, I can succesfully suspend and resume (with loosing only WiFi connection) a machine that is not in the database: s2ram -i produces this: sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS" sys_product = "AMILO Pro Edition V3405" sys_version = "20 " bios_version = "R01-B0E " I

Re: [Suspend-devel] 32-vs-64 bit affects quirks (was Re: Working but not in list)

2007-07-29 Thread Hendrik-Jan Heins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Pavel, list, Today I did some extensive testing with both i386 and amd64 in the X61s. The results are somewhat surprising (yes, to me too). First: I currently use BIOS version 1.06 (the newest Lenovo currently offers). When I started testing, an

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend - libz dependency

2007-07-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:41, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Which version of pciutils do you have? > > > > > > > > pciuti

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend - libz dependency

2007-07-29 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Which version of pciutils do you have? > > > > > > pciutils-2.2.4-13 > > > > OK. > > pkg-config stuff was introduced in

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend - libz dependency

2007-07-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Which version of pciutils do you have? > > > > pciutils-2.2.4-13 > > OK. > pkg-config stuff was introduced in pciutils-2.2.6 > > I will fix this at autoconf/automake, but I need you

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend - libz dependency

2007-07-29 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which version of pciutils do you have? > > pciutils-2.2.4-13 OK. pkg-config stuff was introduced in pciutils-2.2.6 I will fix this at autoconf/automake, but I need you to commit all changes first... I think the lzo patch is the only mis

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend - libz dependency

2007-07-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 20:01, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It doesn't work on my system (openSUSE 10.2). > > What do you get? s2ram-x86.o: In function `s2ram_resume': s2ram-x86.c:(.text+0x31e): undefined reference to `pci_cleanup' s2ram-x86.o

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend - libz dependency

2007-07-29 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't work on my system (openSUSE 10.2). What do you get? Which version of pciutils do you have? Can you please send the output of the following command? $ pkg-config --libs libpci Alon. -

Re: [Suspend-devel] resume executable location

2007-07-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 02:44, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:23:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, 19 July 2007 05:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > > > Please consider the following patch. > > > So you can add new files as much as you like... > > > > I'm go

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Enable interactive reboot selection

2007-07-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:51, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > On Friday 27 July 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > On Friday 27 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Apart from this you should also clear the PLATFORM_SUSPEND flag in the > >

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Don't consume 100% CPU

2007-07-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:52, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Just a minor issue, I know you should never reach there... > > But never consume 100% CPU. > > Thanks, I'm going to apply it. Applied. --

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend - libz dependency

2007-07-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 19 July 2007 05:13, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > AFAICS, recent versions of pciutils depend on it. > > Oh... > You don't have to compile it with zlib... > > """The configure script will automatically enable support for a compressed > p

[Suspend-devel] New working machine

2007-07-29 Thread Antti Laine
Hi. I have a HP Compaq nc4400 notebook pc which doesn't seem to be on suspend's whitelist, but works just fine with --force with the latest bios (it did not work with the old bios it had in it when a got the computer). Here is the output of s2ram -i: # s2ram -i This machine can be identified