On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 03:07:02PM +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On 3/30/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll follow up with a small improvement in the style of
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BOTH
> > #define MYNAME "s2both"
> > #else
> > #define MYNAME "s2disk"
> > #endif
> >
> > and l
On 3/30/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll follow up with a small improvement in the style of
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BOTH
> #define MYNAME "s2both"
> #else
> #define MYNAME "s2disk"
> #endif
>
> and later
>
> ...
> usage(MYNAME, ...);
> ...
Pass down argv[0] instead of a hard
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:25:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Op Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:58:10 +0200
> schreef Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > 2) Also pass the short option string to usage and check for each
> > > `val' if it is included in the short option string. At first I
> > > thou
Op Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:58:10 +0200
schreef Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2) Also pass the short option string to usage and check for each
> > `val' if it is included in the short option string. At first I
> > thought this was a bit overkill, but thinking about it, it is more
> > correct
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:29:26PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:30:04 +0200
> Sorry, to change my mind on this;) But if we want to support only
> '--force' and no short option for it this doesn't fit. I can leave out
> the short option from the short option string, but the op
On Thursday, 29 March 2007 21:29, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:30:04 +0200
> Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:04:22AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:32:59 +0200
> > > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:30:04 +0200
Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:04:22AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:32:59 +0200
> > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This is ugly and long, but shows the long options (we could
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:04:22AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:32:59 +0200
> Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is ugly and long, but shows the long options (we could leave out
> > the short options, or go for something like:
> > Usage: suspend [-h|--hel
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:32:59 +0200
Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is ugly and long, but shows the long options (we could leave out
> the short options, or go for something like:
> Usage: suspend [-h|--help]
> [-f|--config ]
> [-s|--image_size ]
>
Hi,
trivial patch:
Index: config.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/suspend/suspend/config.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 config.c
--- config.c10 Nov 2006 00:08:33 - 1.7
+++ config.c29 Mar 2007 08:24:27 -
@@
10 matches
Mail list logo
