Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:18:36PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, it turns out that my last patch for adding comments to usage had a
> horrible bug. Although (struct option_descr) would yield a (struct option),
> as anticipated, the increment of the pointers of these structs ofcour
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:52:37 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 12 May 2007 22:18, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > OK, it turns out that my last patch for adding comments to usage had a
> > horrible bug. Although (struct option_descr) would yield a (struct opt
On Saturday, 12 May 2007 22:18, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, it turns out that my last patch for adding comments to usage had a
> horrible bug. Although (struct option_descr) would yield a (struct option),
> as anticipated, the increment of the pointers of these structs ofcourse
> wouldn't..
Hi,
OK, it turns out that my last patch for adding comments to usage had a
horrible bug. Although (struct option_descr) would yield a (struct option),
as anticipated, the increment of the pointers of these structs ofcourse
wouldn't...
Anyway the patch below fixes this, although also in a bit hac
