virtually unreadable, so it's
difficult to see what the people you say you're replying to actually
said.
Here are the originals, just for the record:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg72690.html>
2008/05/27 Re: [Biofuel
eech, education for the masses, environmentalism, and
on and on. These are ideals that suffer greatly under islamofascism.
Kurt> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:30:56 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at
it
d, Sharia law seems at great odds
> with any form of freedom that westerners are accustomed to. > Date: Wed, 7
> May 2008 06:14:49 +0900> To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again> >
> Hello Kurt>
You're quite right, some confusion there - my apologies, and thanks
for the correction.
Best
Keith
>After a quick google, I think the numbers show that China in
>absolute numbers is much more likely to kill its prisoners than the
>US or any other country. I would suppose a fundamental diffe
interesting.
--- On Tue, 5/27/08, Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Received: Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 9:35 AM
Hello Kurt
Thanks for the response. But it's st
After a quick google, I think the numbers show that China in absolute numbers
is much more likely to kill its prisoners than the US or any other country. I
would suppose a fundamental difference is the amount of publicity surrounding
each execution depending upon the country.
"The exact number
those governments in opposition to the US > >government. However, just
> because the term is not well understood > >does not make its correct use
> inappropriate.> >> >As a side note, I am not sure if the countries I listed
> all enforce > >Sharia Law. I apologize if
ll the world's ills (though that's a
popular pastime these days), but you're certainly in no position to
point fingers like you're doing when your own backyard's in such a
mess, sad to say.
Best
Keith
> > Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 06:14:49 +0900> To:
>biofue
t odds with any
form of freedom that westerners are accustomed to. > Date: Wed, 7 May 2008
06:14:49 +0900> To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again> > Hello Kurt> > >I am too lazy to
double check myself!
Keith
>Of course there's a lot to be said
>for ease of communication, but people tend to see how like us other
>creatures are or aren't as a measure of their superior worth, or of
>their uselessness, which is odious.
That applies as much between humans as between humans and other species. How
Hi Chip
>Keith Addison wrote:
>|> How about Neo-con Fascist.
>|>
>|> Chris
>|
>| That sounds serviceable. I suppose some people would stick "pig" on
>| the end, it fits quite well. Fine critters, pigs. I never met a pig
>| who was a Fascist. I think Orwell gave them a bad press.
>|
>| Best
>|
>|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Addison wrote:
|> How about Neo-con Fascist.
|>
|> Chris
|
| That sounds serviceable. I suppose some people would stick "pig" on
| the end, it fits quite well. Fine critters, pigs. I never met a pig
| who was a Fascist. I think Orwell gave them
-
>From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>Sent: Fri, 9 May 2008 8:28 am
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
>
>>(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)
>
>:-) That's nice.
>
>>how about corpiracy (inflicted on
&g
How about Neo-con Fascist.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Fri, 9 May 2008 8:28 am
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
>(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)
:-) That's nic
>(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)
:-) That's nice.
>how about corpiracy (inflicted on
>us by the "neoprivateers"-nice little double entendre)? probably not.
> too cutesy.
Not bad. Corpiracy is good, needs the right pronunciation though;
neoprivateers is nice but it's not headline language
(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)how about corpiracy (inflicted on
us by the "neoprivateers"-nice little double entendre)? probably not.
too cutesy. if a new word emerges, it'll most likely come from the
street. meanwhile, oligarchy works for me, too. that, or babylon.
On 5/7/08, Keith Addi
Hi Chip
>Keith Addison wrote:
>> Hi Chip, Chris and all
>>
>> This is the famous Mussolini quote: "Fascism should more properly be
>> called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate
>> power." -- Benito Mussolini
>>
>> But Public Eye reckons he never said it. See:
>> http:
Keith Addison wrote:
> Hi Chip, Chris and all
>
> This is the famous Mussolini quote: "Fascism should more properly be
> called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate
> power." -- Benito Mussolini
>
> But Public Eye reckons he never said it. See:
> http://www.publiceye.org/
at information incorrect. I am
>too lazy to double check myself!
>
>I do agree that the US is slipping into a nationalistic version of
>fascism. This is why it is important to celebrate other country's
>successes, to show that the US way is not always the best, or righ
always the best, or right way.
Kurt> Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 21:28:30 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at
it again> > The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient
margin of liber
Hi Chip, Chris and all
This is the famous Mussolini quote: "Fascism should more properly be
called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate
power." -- Benito Mussolini
But Public Eye reckons he never said it. See:
http://www.publiceye.org/fascist/corporatism.html
Mussolini on
Chris Burck wrote:
> well, when terms like "islamo-fascist" get slung about, yeah, you bet
> the meaning has been degraded. that's precisely the purpose for which
> such terms have been coined. that extreme notwithstanding, and though
> the pejorative use of the word exists, it has been far less
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chip Mefford
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:52 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
Chris Burck wrote:
> the wiki articles place too much emphasis imho on fascism as a
> phi
well, when terms like "islamo-fascist" get slung about, yeah, you bet
the meaning has been degraded. that's precisely the purpose for which
such terms have been coined. that extreme notwithstanding, and though
the pejorative use of the word exists, it has been far less abused
than the barbs typi
Chris Burck wrote:
> the wiki articles place too much emphasis imho on fascism as a
> philosophy, though they do discuss corporatism,
> production/productivism, and strong government intervention in favor
> of the economic elites.
im(not so -h)o that has to do with the fact that it's a pejorative
the wiki articles place too much emphasis imho on fascism as a
philosophy, though they do discuss corporatism,
production/productivism, and strong government intervention in favor
of the economic elites.
On 5/5/08, Kirk McLoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good URL Andy. Everyone should look at it
Good URL Andy. Everyone should look at it.
Most politicians seem to be a sick breed of cat. Power mad sociopaths. How
they can be so toxic and not even have a hint of their pathology is beyond me.
Kirk
Andy Karpay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For "some reason" Wikipedia definition of fasc
For "some reason" Wikipedia definition of fascism has lost its references to
merging corporatism with the state (it's what I don't like about Wikipedia).
However, some common threads can be seen here.
14 Points of fascism: The warning signs
http://oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm
AK
The Fasci
The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of
liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly
harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this
question cannot be the individual, but the State alone
---
Was that fascist as in /extreme/ nationalism?
Or is that fascist as in pejorative label applied
to things we don't like, without any real definition
or meaning?
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/li
April 27, 2008
Print this article
Bills C51& C52 - More Regulations To Protect Us Of Course Categories
Control tactics
Health through Nutrition
Practical Health
Take Action
The Nature of Government
The House of Commons Standing Committee on Health decided by way o
31 matches
Mail list logo
