02, 2005 15:36
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
> Greg, jet fuel could be made from a number of sources such
> as fossil natural gas or coal, or better from renewable
> sources. basically any source of carbon and hydrogen as
> found in num
ng to
cause an increase in the cost of flying.
- Original Message -
From: "Juan Boveda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hello Greg and all.
veda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
> Hello Greg and all.
>
> I disagree with some appreciation about the cost of flying because the
fuel
> cost incr
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
> Hello Greg and all.
>
> I disagree with some appreciation about the cost of flying because the
fuel
> cost increase th
Sorry about the delay, I been busy with illness and the furnace
installation.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:51
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/
I notice you didn't respond to this - the discussion on your claim
that the end of fossil fuels will mean the end of the fight against
world hunger (below).
You have to do some studying Greg, you've got this all wrong...
So here's a bit more for you.
http://wwia.org/pipermail/biofuel/Wee
ROTECTED]
Sent: 02/24/2005 1:28 PM
For:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
[snip]
I think that I explained it a little better above.Perhaps a little
more:
In order to sequester 200 yrs of CO2, I thing that extreme measures will
have to be
I'll snip most of this...
Couple of points: I've never heard anyone but you proposing that we
need to sequester the last 200 years of human carbon emissions.
> >OTOH, I am sure, that there is currently a disturbing
> >trend, that needs to be delt with, be it short term or long term.
>
> D
Best wishes
Keith
An important point which often gets missed is that we are adding to the
atmosphere gases of known properties: they cause the atmosphere to retain
heat.
And, if the atmosphere didn't already contain gases which retain heat,
the Earth would be very much colder than it is.
T
Sorry for not getting back sooner, it's been a little hectic in the last
couple of days.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:10
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- noth
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 07:29
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
I am keeping the perspective, the carbon was around in one fo
An important point which often gets missed is that we are adding to the
atmosphere gases of known properties: they cause the atmosphere to retain
heat.
And, if the atmosphere didn't already contain gases which retain heat,
the Earth would be very much colder than it is.
There are many secondary
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 07:29
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
>
> In one form or another yes, but which form, and for how
r of peat is
> > burned away, it can no longer insulate the permafrost lower down, once
the
> > permafrost melts, the peat in those layers is subject to decay, and it
> > release's more CO2 while decaying, for months even years after the fire
has
> > occurred.
> >
n hope for is a slowed rate
increase in atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gasses.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: "bob allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 19:09
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of c
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:18
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Thompson, Mark L. (PNB R&D) wrote:
Sorry Mike
Actually most CO2 emissions come from Decomposing Plant material.
That is immat
teady state.
> Anthropogenic emissions are above and beyond natural emissions.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Provost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:31
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/j
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Redler
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hi Mark,
You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science"
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the
On Feb 22, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Thompson, Mark L. (PNB R&D) wrote:
Sorry Mike
Actually most CO2 emissions come from Decomposing Plant material.
It is amazing what pointing out simple "Off subject" issues in a post
will do.
Decomposing plant material is carbon-neutral, of course, and
therefo
nt: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hi Mark,
You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science"
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our
civilization comes from the bur
nt: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hi Mark,
You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science"
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our
civilization comes from the bur
Hi Mark,
You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science"
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our civilization comes
from the burning of fossil fuels, here's a little experiment you can do at home.
1.) Get yourself a chain saw and bring it with you into your bathroom
2
22 matches
Mail list logo
