>Hello:
>
>Do you have the name of the Cornell study. I would like to read it.
>
>Also, is it archived on-line?
>
>Thanks for the info.
>
>Thom Lemens
You'll find it here:
http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol_energy.html
See also previous message:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?view=16963&
Hello:
Do you have the name of the Cornell study. I would like to read it.
Also, is it archived on-line?
Thanks for the info.
Thom Lemens
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Plan to Sell a Home?
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J2SnNA/y.lEAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
--
the world.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Cornell University study debunks ethanol
> >What gives, you ask?
> >
> >Are you sure about the date? Pi
- Original Message -
From: "womplex_oo1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 21:36
Subject: [biofuel] Cornell University study debunks ethanol
>
> The study concluded that petroleum was used to produce a lesser
> amount of ethanol (41 pe
Geo or other auto that
> >goes into circulation.
> >
> >Yet numerous people off-handedly accept Pimental's "study"
> >without much question. Why? Because he has a few letters dangling
> >from his last name?
> >
> >As I said before [Snip], eve
ingly spread.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: womplex_oo1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:36 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Cornell University study debunks ethanol
> In late 2001 a Cornell Univerity scientist published a paper
> concluding that i
In late 2001 a Cornell Univerity scientist published a paper
concluding that it took more energy to harvest, ferment and distill
corn than was yielded as ethanol. Specifically it took 131,000 Btu
to produce a gallon of ethanol while that gallon only contained
77,000 Btu, representing a net en
