>
>>Perhaps their strategy (keeping their mouths shut) is
>>different than the strategies of BP-Amoco and Shell which have allowed
>>more smoking guns?
>
>I think the main difference is that they're headquartered in the US
>and BP-Amoco and Shell are hq'd in the UK. Being hq'd in the US
>hasn't
Hi MM
> >Almost certainly nah. They're probably more similar than different,
> >and BP-Amoco, for all their pro-solar and pro-renewables greenwash,
> >spent more on their pretty eco-friendly logo in 1999 than they did on
> >renewable energy, with the usual billions going on oil exploration.
> >Sc
>Almost certainly nah. They're probably more similar than different,
>and BP-Amoco, for all their pro-solar and pro-renewables greenwash,
>spent more on their pretty eco-friendly logo in 1999 than they did on
>renewable energy, with the usual billions going on oil exploration.
>Scepticism defi
>http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030902/detu010_1.html
>
>Mundane as this story may be, it lends some perspective as to the
>extent that ECD's (Energy Conversion Devices, stock symbol ENER)
>actions, and the progress of their NiMH efforts and Unisolar efforts,
>are governed in part by important member
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030902/detu010_1.html
Mundane as this story may be, it lends some perspective as to the
extent that ECD's (Energy Conversion Devices, stock symbol ENER)
actions, and the progress of their NiMH efforts and Unisolar efforts,
are governed in part by important members of t
