I don't see why it could not compete with the LS coal, because is has
even less sulfur that the coal does. As air restrictions get tighter and
tighter even LS coal is going to become less cost effective.
If restrictions get that tight, pretreating the coal will probably still
be cheaper than
- Original Message -
From: Marc de Piolenc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 08:05
Subject: [biofuel] Low temperature carbonization
If restrictions get that tight, pretreating the coal will probably still
be cheaper than buying char
I've been following the current hooraw about low-temperature
carbonization with some confusion. I can't quite tell what the commotion
is about. This is not new technology - it was used in primitive form to
make retort gas for industrial and domestic use from the late 19th
century through (in some
- Original Message -
From: Marc de Piolenc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 00:56
Subject: [biofuel] Low-temperature carbonization
There can't be any doubt of its feasibility, for the obvious reason that
it was practiced for years. Its
