Glycerin Soaps and Corporate Deception was Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

te for their "theft" from the original product, in turn charging premium dollar for remedies to the problem they've created. Welcome to capitalism. Todd Swearingen - Original Message - From: kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:26 PM Subject:

RE: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA > > RE: thermal cracking. I have been looking at the process of producing > > biodiesel from a medium sized produder point of view. If someone could > > spend > > $4,000,000 to make 1500 gal o

Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

> > RE: thermal cracking. I have been looking at the process of producing > > biodiesel from a medium sized produder point of view. If someone could > > spend > > $4,000,000 to make 1500 gal of biodiesel an hour with little additional > > inputs besides heat, it could be something. Biomass heat

Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

> RE: thermal cracking. I have been looking at the process of producing > biodiesel from a medium sized produder point of view. If someone could > spend > $4,000,000 to make 1500 gal of biodiesel an hour with little additional > inputs besides heat, it could be something. Biomass heat or p

Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA/thermal cracking

Neal, I am interested in discussing thermal cracking and have been doing some research regarding the use of supercritical methanol as a relativly simple to automate scalable transesterification process. I will restrain myself from extraneous editorial comment here lest I be the subject of ridic

Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

es, should those consequences become reality, the neglect no longer borders on criminal but becomes so. Todd Swearingen - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:16 PM Subject: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA &l

[biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

Well, whatever you say, Neal. >RE: thermal cracking. I have been looking at the process of producing >biodiesel from a medium sized produder point of view. If someone could spend >$4,000,000 to make 1500 gal of biodiesel an hour with little additional >inputs besides heat, it could be somethi

Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:16 Subject: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA > RE: thermal cracking. I have been looking at the process of producing > biodiesel from a medium sized produder point of view. If someone

[biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

<> Hey, Keith, calm down. I was asking about the political commentary which preceded the biofuels content that animal fat is more available lately. I don't think you have a hidden agenda. I think you explain yourself very well and directly. You and I and everybody else on the plant is con

[biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

Keith and Todd, OK I surrender. There are a lot of issues that you brought up which are worth discussing over coffee at length. We might even find that we agree on many points, and not on others. Hey, I wrote a note on another discussion group asking about biodiesel in UK using condemned ca

[biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

Hello Neal Missed this one, somehow. I'm afraid I rather object to being termed a "visionary", and, on SANET, an "activist". I'm a journalist, is all. Hint: if you're after getting a bit of good press out of the local rag don't go and tell the desk hack he's a "visionary activist", LOL. >In

Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

who mine for coal - or "experts" in any other endeavor - would posess the "authority" to discuss the respective detrimentsand we all know where that has taken humanity. Todd Swearingen - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com

[biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

Hello Neal >Keith, I know the reason you posted the lengthy message about the GAO report >saying BSE is not in the USA was to point out to us in the last paragraph >that animal fat is becoming cheaper and more readily available in the US >market. There were quite a few reasons, but I think they'

[biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

In a message dated 3/3/2002 5:11:31 AM Central Standard Time, biofuel@yahoogroups.com writes: < Subject: Re: Re: BSE not in the USA Safety of American markets from BSE is far from certain...so much so that studies released this week actually gave

Re: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

TED] To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 9:14 PM Subject: [biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA Keith, I know the reason you posted the lengthy message about the GAO report saying BSE is not in the USA was to point out to us in the last paragraph that animal fat is becomi

[biofuel] Re: BSE not in the USA

Keith, I know the reason you posted the lengthy message about the GAO report saying BSE is not in the USA was to point out to us in the last paragraph that animal fat is becoming cheaper and more readily available in the US market. I don't imagine you were actually saying that the GAO knows mo