--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hakan,
>
> I am sorry MH,
Its ok Hakan. I won't hold it personal.
I'm pleased you've found a few of my inputs
interesting. I hope this IS conspiracy
theory as suggested. I don't want to hear
this but perhaps a CAUTIONARY l
--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Hakan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear MH,
I am not holding anything against you and it is many, for me, interesting
things coming from you. I am not a professional journalist, but I try
anyway to check the credibility of what I read, this especially if I want
- Original Message -
From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 02:12
Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
>
> Well Greg, that leave us with an interesting mathematical problem.
>
> Given more numbers (knowledge), do
I am sorry MH,
This is probably a produce from those conspiracy theory groups that
are floating around. Too unreal and not fitting into the American system
of balance between policy making and executive powers.
I might have an issue with Bush on energy policies and related issues,
but I cannot
ot;Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 20:11
>Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
>
>
> > Well, Greg, when you want things to add up, you should include ALL
> > the numbers, not just some of them.
> >
>
>Nobod
Published on Sunday, September 15, 2002 in The Sunday Herald (Scotland)
Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming President
by Neil Mackay
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0915-01.htm
A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that President Bush and
his cabinet w
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 20:11
Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
> Well, Greg, when you want things to add up, you should include ALL
> the numbers, not just some of them.
>
No
Hitting OPEC by way of Baghdad
Paul Klebnikov, 10.28.02
http://www.forbes.com/global/2002/1028/024.html
Iraq has huge oil reserves and the world's cheapest lifting costs. That's why
a war
against Saddam could change everything.
Charting a military outcome in Iraq is dicey, and some say
Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 20:40
>Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
>
>
> > >I personaly think he is right.
> > >
> > >Greg H.
> >
> > There's been a lot of information - as opposed
Hi Martin,
At 05:12 PM 2/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Hakan Falk wrote:
>
> >Greg,
> >
> >Get the picture please,
> >
> >1. If US must relay only on domestic oil reserves the R/P is 10.7. this
> >means that US have no oil 2013, if new domestic fields are not found. This
> >is a serious situation f
Hakan Falk wrote:
>Greg,
>
>Get the picture please,
>
>1. If US must relay only on domestic oil reserves the R/P is 10.7. this
>means that US have no oil 2013, if new domestic fields are not found. This
>is a serious situation for the world's largest economy. Please try to
>understand this and
>
>To:
>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 20:40
>Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
>
>
> > >I personaly think he is right.
> > >
> > >Greg H.
> >
> > There's been a lot of information - as opposed to opinionated
> > frothing
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 20:40
Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
> >I personaly think he is right.
> >
> >Greg H.
>
> There's been a lot of information - a
nt ways. But
>he's right?
>
>Keith
>
> >- Original Message -----
> >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To:
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 14:05
> >Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
> >
> >
> > > I have an old
Iraq didn't bomb the US but
the US/UK continues bombing Iraq.
U.S. Bombing Watch: When was the last time the U.S. Bombed Iraq?
Archive from 2000 to 2003
"Colorado Campaign for Middle East Peace"
http://www.ccmep.org/usbombingwatch/2003.htm
The bombing continues in Iraq and
the conce
al Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 14:05
>Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
>
>
> > I have an old friend who has lived in the USA for the last 15 years (he's
> > English)
> > I recently wrote
I personaly think he is right.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 14:05
Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
> I have an old friend who has lived in the USA for the last 15 years (he's
> English)
>
I have an old friend who has lived in the USA for the last 15 years (he's
English)
I recently wrote the following to him...
We're all waiting for the war here in the expectation that it will turn the
local economy down a few notches. I've yet to meet a single person in
support. What are your
>On 11 Feb 2003 at 17:53, Myles Twete wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that going for Iraq's Oil is only the small
> > potatos--or at least the near-term ones. What Bush/Cheney/Bechtel are
> > really after is Iraq's dams and water damming potential---which will
> > last long past when the oil drie
On 11 Feb 2003 at 17:53, Myles Twete wrote:
> My understanding is that going for Iraq's Oil is only the small
> potatos--or at least the near-term ones. What Bush/Cheney/Bechtel are
> really after is Iraq's dams and water damming potential---which will
> last long past when the oil dries up H
the republocrat
kleptocracy...or is it a kakistocracy?
-mt
-Original Message-
From: Ken Provost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:18 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
Myles writes:
>My understanding is that going for Iraq's
Myles writes:
>My understanding is that going for Iraq's Oil is only the
>small potatoes--or at least the near-term ones.
>What Bush/Cheney/Bechtel are really after is Iraq's dams
>and water damming potential---which will last long past
>when the oil dries up
>He who controls water, controls
ssage -
From: "Myles Twete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:53 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
> My understanding is that going for Iraq's Oil is only the small
potatos--or
> at least the near-term ones.
> What Bush/Cheney/Bechtel
Wedgewood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:03 PM
>Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
>
>
> > If the US plans are to take over the oil in Iraq why didn't they
> > keep it the last time. They all ready had control of the oil
&g
Hi Ernie
>If the US plans are to take over the oil in Iraq why didn't they
>keep it the last time. They all ready had control of the oil
>fields when they extinguished the fires in the last attack.
Different goal that time, wasn't it? - it keeps coming up here,
there's plenty about it in the ar
e than oil.
-Myles Twete
-Original Message-
From: Ernie Wedgewood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:03 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
If the US plans are to take over the oil in Iraq why didn't they
keep it the last time.
nt: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] The oil in Iraq
> If the US plans are to take over the oil in Iraq why didn't they
> keep it the last time. They all ready had control of the oil
> fields when they extinguished the fires in the last attack.
>
> I am
If the US plans are to take over the oil in Iraq why didn't they
keep it the last time. They all ready had control of the oil
fields when they extinguished the fires in the last attack.
I am not sure that this is just about oil. But I must admit that
the oil fields of Iraq would be a great prise
I looked at CNN's Q&A and it is amazing which people they muster to engage
on the issue of the Iraq oil and US interest in it. I sent the following
email to them,
"If US must rely on their known oil reserves it would be finished in around
10 years. To say that US is not acting out of oil supp
29 matches
Mail list logo
