Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-26 Thread Arcologic
I may have fallen off the thread here-- are we still talking about th h.o.g.? I applaud the imagination of the h.o.g. developers. I'm sorry, they seem doomed to failure. Too much mass and serious doubts about the effectiveness of the design. Ernie Rogers In a message dated 11/24/04 5:58:14

RE: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-23 Thread Chris Lloyd
> The hours of operation aren't even close. The comparison is invalid. < Incorrect as our coaches are running 16 hours a day and the loads on those turbine bears are nowhere near the loads on the drive shaft bearings behind the 200 hp motor. Chris. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-23 Thread Martin Klingensmith
automatic positioning requires "controls" be it a cam and a linkage or a motor and electronics. It doesn't mean an operator is on duty. Kirk --- Martin K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think it has controls, I think they are positioned automatically. If this is not the case please

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-23 Thread Dave Brockes
ite: http://energytransfercorporation.com/ Sorry to be so wordy, just trying to make this as simple as possible. Dave - Original Message - From: "Martin K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:04 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel]

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-23 Thread Kirk McLoren
automatic positioning requires "controls" be it a cam and a linkage or a motor and electronics. It doesn't mean an operator is on duty. Kirk --- Martin K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it has controls, I think they are > positioned > automatically. If this is not the case please

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-23 Thread Dave Brockes
again, it depends on material costs. Dave - Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 1:59 AM Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind Elegance of des

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-23 Thread Martin K
automatically. If this is not the case please let me know. Kirk McLoren wrote: The hours of operation aren't even close. The comparison is invalid. Then there is the question of which bearings you refer to. Wheel bearings? Totally different application from moving the foils. The applied

RE: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-22 Thread Kirk McLoren
The hours of operation aren't even close. The comparison is invalid. Then there is the question of which bearings you refer to. Wheel bearings? Totally different application from moving the foils. The applied loads in that machine are very large. That makes the controls large which means expe

RE: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-22 Thread Chris Lloyd
> Elegance of design means simple. I would like to see a tally of wear points for this design plus fab costs. I doubt it will pencil. < If the sealed grease bearings on my truck can be made to last 10 years I see no problem if it's built well enough. There is no reason these days to have short be

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-22 Thread Phillip Wolfe
ormation will be limited to what they have been > > able to learn with other > > models they have built to this point. > > > > Happy Thanksgiving to all who celebrate it and > enjoy > > this time with your > > families. > > > > > > -

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-22 Thread Martin K
Kirk McLoren wrote: From the description: Bearing little resemblance to the older prop type models, the H.O.G. is 61 feet in diameter, weighing 30,000 pounds and approximately 26 feet high. Not only huge but complex. I went to a drag design only because I have a stupidly simple idea of how t

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-22 Thread Kirk McLoren
brate it and enjoy > this time with your > families. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kirk McLoren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 10:35 PM > Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-21 Thread Dave Brockes
point. Happy Thanksgiving to all who celebrate it and enjoy this time with your families. - Original Message - From: "Kirk McLoren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 10:35 PM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turb

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-21 Thread Kirk McLoren
Not Swedish. Bohemian Celt actually. Was madly infatuated with a little Norwegian girl when we were in the 8th grade though. She told me ufda was being at the airport when your ship comes in. As to your other question -- Fatigue stress is much higher in a VAWT than a HAWT. Inescapable. To quote

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-21 Thread Arcologic
Kirk, There's nothing wrong with vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs), in principle. All turbines deal with "turbulent" loads more or less. The problem is with business attitudes-- companies dropped the VAWTs when they were not looking competitive, and now few people are willing to go back an

Re: [Biofuel] Vertical axis wind turbines Another approach to wind

2004-11-20 Thread Kirk McLoren
All the VAT I know about suffered fatigue and broke due to reversal every revolution. It is a design weakness. All you can do is select materials etc to extend mtbf but it is built in. I used to be enthusiastic about them as I wanted to avoid the problems in the conventional designs. They aren't