Hi folks,
This is just a short notice that the examotion website
(http://www.examotion.com) as well as the svg zone website
(http://www.svgzone.com) have been updated. This is all part of our new
communication and community efford strategy which you can read more
about at the svg zone's first
We've also finally opened our labs.
Sounds great. Let's hope the alpha and beta versions [1] are made
available soon. :-)
Hope you like our new effords,
Yes, already noticed a minor though relevant improvement [2] (for
interoperability purposes) within the site updates. Let's just wait
for
hi all,
Is there a bug with svg's which means that transforms are broken when
the aspect ratio is changed in the viewbox? If I do the translation
in the viewbox and then scale using
document.documentElement.currentScale then these xlink objects keep
there position.
My SVG is as follows;
?xml
Sorry,
I am using IE with adobe svg viewer, and have tested on firefox.
The problem is that if I change the view box width and height properties of my
document then any symbols which undergo transforms do not lie correctly in the
new viewbox, i.e. if one box is placed on top of the other in
Hi! :-)
Is there a bug with svg's which means that transforms are broken
when the aspect ratio is changed in the viewbox? If I do the
translation in the viewbox and then scale using
document.documentElement.currentScale then these xlink objects keep
there position.
Could you be a bit
Hi folks,
I've been trying, rather unsystematically, to explore various options for SVG
editing/authoring.
See http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/Authoring_tools_and_editors for a
list of things known or suspected of being relevant to the task (both software
packages and features relevant
The argument of the function fade should be called event, not
target. With the previously defined function getTarget, the first
part in fade can be simplified to
var target = getTarget(event);
Or otherwise you don't need to define an extra function for it.
Since you start the animation with
Thanks, Jake, for the information.
Tak
--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Jake Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:02 PM, takpoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jack,
It looks cool. Questions:
1. Do you know what is the status of dojox.gfx? Could I use
A couple of comments:
At the moment there is certainly no one-stop-shop IDE for SVG
development. It may be conceptually useful, then, to separate
development out into several tasks. This way, you can choose which
tool is most appropriate for any given task. I would propose that SVG
development
Jake wrote:
At the moment there is certainly no one-stop-shop IDE for SVG
development. It may be conceptually useful, then, to separate
development out into several tasks. This way, you can choose which
tool is most appropriate for any given task. I would propose that SVG
development may be
Regarding #1 --- both SVG and VML renderers are deemed production and
fully supported. Silverlight is getting there and will be promoted to
production in 1.3 unless some major bug will be discovered and not
fixed in time for 1.3 (Dojo 1.2 was released several days ago).
The latest API
FYI, I just tests Aptana with the embedded Gecko renderer on a
compound XHTML-SVG document (.xhtml extension, so the Eclipse wouldn't
get confused about the MIME type), and it totally worked. Nice little
animated SVG prototype running right there in Eclipse :-)
I'm quite pleased about this, as it
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Eugene Lazutkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding #1 --- both SVG and VML renderers are deemed production and
fully supported. Silverlight is getting there and will be promoted to
production in 1.3 unless some major bug will be discovered and not
fixed in time
Inline.
Jake Beard wrote:
The latest API documentation can be found here:
http://docs.dojocampus.org/dojox/gfx. Please let me know what things
don't work that should, or there is a confusion between possible bugs
and features. The direct link to our DojoX support forum:
14 matches
Mail list logo
