[svg-developers] Re: DTD declaration, was:Re: google and SVG

2005-04-02 Thread Jim Ley
"Robin Berjon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > There are some simple Apache tricks you can use to send your XHTML > documents as application/xhtml+xml to up-to-date browsers and as > text/html to obsolete tag-soupers like IE. That is however a very bad idea, becaus

Re: [svg-developers] Re: DTD declaration, was:Re: google and SVG

2005-04-01 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi Marjorie, Marjorie Roswell wrote: > I wish I knew what you guys are talking about. I wouldn't worry about it, just learn as you go :) > obsolete tag-soupers? Browsers that are obsolete and only understand a very limited and buggy subset of Web technology. The most typical one is Internet E

Re: [svg-developers] Re: DTD declaration, was:Re: google and SVG

2005-04-01 Thread Robin Berjon
Holger Will wrote: > How i understand it , following Robin Berjon, a basic SVG file should > look like this: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";> > > > no ! no ! > only the namespace (xmlns="...") > > note: and if you use xlink dont forget > xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; > > m

Re: [svg-developers] Re: DTD declaration, was:Re: google and SVG

2005-04-01 Thread Holger Will
Marjorie Roswell wrote: > > (A two-part question, really: > 1. What should I learn from this dialog? > > How i understand it , following Robin Berjon, a basic SVG file should look like this: http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";> no ! no ! only the namespace (xmlns="...") note: and if you use xlin

Re: [svg-developers] Re: DTD declaration, was:Re: google and SVG

2005-04-01 Thread Michael Bolger
Jim Ley wrote: >Not serving XHTML to HTML user agents is far and away your best option. What about XHTML 1.1 with the iframe module for serving/presenting the .svg, close to now or in the near future? thanks michael - To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http:

[svg-developers] Re: DTD declaration, was:Re: google and SVG

2005-04-01 Thread Marjorie Roswell
I wish I knew what you guys are talking about. obsolete tag-soupers? namespace-unaware things? avoiding the doctype? What should a relative newbie take away from this dialog? What should I do differently when working with SVG? Can somebody build a little clip file in textpad (a great text edito

[svg-developers] Re: DTD declaration, was:Re: google and SVG

2005-03-31 Thread Jim Ley
"Philippe Lhoste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hmm, perhaps no, I believe we should avoid the > line because some browsers choke on it, No, not browsers choke on that in an XML page. Of course some people misguidedly serve XML documents pretending it's not