Quoting Ulrich Spörlein (from Mon, 16 Mar 2009
19:35:34 +0100):
On Fri, 13.03.2009 at 14:22:16 -0400, David Schultz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> Now, you only need to revive the BSD-licensed libiconv[1]. :)
[...]
> 1. http://people.freebsd.org/~bland/iconv-2.1.tar
On Fri, 13.03.2009 at 14:22:16 -0400, David Schultz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> > Now, you only need to revive the BSD-licensed libiconv[1]. :)
> [...]
> > 1. http://people.freebsd.org/~bland/iconv-2.1.tar.gz
>
> I asked a few weeks ago on standards@ why we weren't us
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:36:07PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> I have not explored either. The Citrus version appears to have more
> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
> license.
Please forget whatever you read on the Citrus website and just look
inside the N
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Xin LI wrote:
Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:36:07 -0500 (CDT) "Sean C. Farley"
wrote:
functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
license.
Really? > ambigous
Citrus is license
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 06:59 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi Sean!
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:00 -0500 (CDT)
> "Sean C. Farley" wrote:
> > >> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
> > >> license.
> > > Really? > ambigous
> > > Citrus is licensed under BSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
>
>> Hi Sean!
>
> Hi Norikatsu,
>
>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:36:07 -0500 (CDT)
>> "Sean C. Farley" wrote:
>>> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
>
Hi Sean!
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:00 -0500 (CDT)
"Sean C. Farley" wrote:
> >> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
> >> license.
> > Really? > ambigous
> > Citrus is licensed under BSD License or variant (like
> > Perl or MIT). It can use with (L)GPL.
>
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
Hi Sean!
Hi Norikatsu,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:36:07 -0500 (CDT)
"Sean C. Farley" wrote:
functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
license.
Really? > ambigous
Citrus is licensed under BSD License or va
Hi Sean!
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:36:07 -0500 (CDT)
"Sean C. Farley" wrote:
> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the
> license.
Really? > ambigous
Citrus is licensed under BSD License or variant (like
Perl or MIT). It can use with (L)GPL.
Ivan Voras escribió:
2009/3/13 Gábor Kövesdán :
Nice! I need to find some time to learn how to use NLS.
Now, you only need to revive the BSD-licensed libiconv[1]. :) I am
kidding; I do not want to start adding more stuff to your plate. Thank you
for strengthening FreeBSD's i18n support.
2009/3/13 Gábor Kövesdán :
>
>> Nice! I need to find some time to learn how to use NLS.
>>
>> Now, you only need to revive the BSD-licensed libiconv[1]. :) I am
>> kidding; I do not want to start adding more stuff to your plate. Thank you
>> for strengthening FreeBSD's i18n support.
>>
>> Out
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, David Schultz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009, Sean C. Farley wrote:
Now, you only need to revive the BSD-licensed libiconv[1]. :)
[...]
1. http://people.freebsd.org/~bland/iconv-2.1.tar.gz
I asked a few weeks ago on standards@ why we weren't using Citrus
iconv, which is
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> Now, you only need to revive the BSD-licensed libiconv[1]. :)
[...]
> 1. http://people.freebsd.org/~bland/iconv-2.1.tar.gz
I asked a few weeks ago on standards@ why we weren't using Citrus
iconv, which is what NetBSD uses, and seems to be in a somew
Nice! I need to find some time to learn how to use NLS.
Now, you only need to revive the BSD-licensed libiconv[1]. :) I am
kidding; I do not want to start adding more stuff to your plate.
Thank you for strengthening FreeBSD's i18n support.
Out of curiosity, how does enabling NLS in lib
Robert Watson escribió:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
- Reenable Native Language Support in libc. This feature was
disabled due
to possible breakages in the catalog handling code. Since then, that
code has been replaced by the secure code from NetBSD but NLS in libc
r
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Author: gabor (doc,ports committer)
Date: Fri Mar 13 10:40:38 2009
New Revision: 189765
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/189765
Log:
- Reenable Native Language Support in libc. This feature was disabled due
to possible breakages in the c
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
- Reenable Native Language Support in libc. This feature was disabled due
to possible breakages in the catalog handling code. Since then, that
code has been replaced by the secure code from NetBSD but NLS in libc
remained turned off. Tests
Author: gabor (doc,ports committer)
Date: Fri Mar 13 10:40:38 2009
New Revision: 189765
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/189765
Log:
- Reenable Native Language Support in libc. This feature was disabled due
to possible breakages in the catalog handling code. Since then, that
18 matches
Mail list logo
