Ed,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
E Author: emaste
E Date: Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
E New Revision: 240938
E URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240938
E
E Log:
E Avoid INVARIANTS panic destroying an in-use tap(4)
E
E The requirement (implied by the
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:56:15AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T Ed,
T
T On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
T E Author: emaste
T E Date: Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
T E New Revision: 240938
T E URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240938
T E
T E Log:
T E Avoid
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
[...]
Note: if_tun had the same issue, addressed in SVN revisions r186391,
r186483 and r186497. The use of the condvar there appears to be
redundant with the functionality provided by destroy_dev.
[...]
---
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:54:43AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
[...]
Note: if_tun had the same issue, addressed in SVN revisions r186391,
r186483 and r186497. The use of the condvar there appears to be
redundant with
On 26 September 2012 00:52, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
Author: emaste
Date: Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
New Revision: 240938
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240938
Log:
Avoid INVARIANTS panic destroying
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:48:03AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 26 September 2012 00:52, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
Author: emaste
Date: Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
New Revision: 240938
URL:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:48:03 am Ed Maste wrote:
On 26 September 2012 00:52, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
Author: emaste
Date: Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
New Revision: 240938
URL:
Author: emaste
Date: Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
New Revision: 240938
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240938
Log:
Avoid INVARIANTS panic destroying an in-use tap(4)
The requirement (implied by the KASSERT in tap_destroy) that the tap is
closed isn't valid; destroy_dev will block
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:10:14PM +, Ed Maste wrote:
Author: emaste
Date: Tue Sep 25 22:10:14 2012
New Revision: 240938
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240938
Log:
Avoid INVARIANTS panic destroying an in-use tap(4)
The requirement (implied by the KASSERT in