On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:41:00AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:58:13 AM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 04:04:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Move of the code to initialize CPU from identcpu() to initializecpu()
> > seems to be a fix on
On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:58:13 AM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 04:04:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > @@ -692,6 +706,27 @@
> >
> > #ifdef I586_CPU
> >
> > case CPU_586:
> > switch (cpu_vendor_id) {
> >
> > + case CPU_VENDOR_AMD:
> >
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 04:04:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, September 05, 2014 10:44:05 AM John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, September 05, 2014 4:43:05 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > There is one weird detail, not touched by your patch. Amd64 resume
> > > path calls initialize
On Friday, September 05, 2014 10:44:05 AM John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, September 05, 2014 4:43:05 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > There is one weird detail, not touched by your patch. Amd64 resume
> > path calls initializecpu(), while i386 does not. I do not see any
> > use for the call, th
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:44:05AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, September 05, 2014 4:43:05 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:50:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 02, 2014 06:41:27 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, John Baldwin wrote:
We might also consider removing support for 486sx CPUs and requiring an
on-CPU FPU for i386. If we do that we might able to use a common fpu.c
which would be even nicer.
You mean a common npx.c. The 'x' part of npx.c is much more descriptive
now than i
On Friday, September 05, 2014 4:43:05 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:50:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 02, 2014 06:41:27 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:00:57AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > I thought about t
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:50:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 02, 2014 06:41:27 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:00:57AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > I thought about that. I could easily make a parallel array, or perhaps
> > > use a separate
On Tuesday, September 02, 2014 06:41:27 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:00:57AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > I thought about that. I could easily make a parallel array, or perhaps
> > use a separate 'susppcb' structure that includes a pcb and the savefpu
> > union and
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:00:57AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, August 30, 2014 3:58:09 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 05:48:38PM +, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Author: jhb
> > > Date: Sat Aug 30 17:48:38 2014
> > > New Revision: 270850
> > > URL: http://sv
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 3:58:09 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 05:48:38PM +, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Author: jhb
> > Date: Sat Aug 30 17:48:38 2014
> > New Revision: 270850
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270850
> >
> > Log:
> > Save and restor
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 05:48:38PM +, John Baldwin wrote:
> Author: jhb
> Date: Sat Aug 30 17:48:38 2014
> New Revision: 270850
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270850
>
> Log:
> Save and restore FPU state across suspend and resume. In earlier revisions
> of this patch, res
On 30 August 2014 10:58, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, August 30, 2014 05:48:38 PM John Baldwin wrote:
>> Author: jhb
>> Date: Sat Aug 30 17:48:38 2014
>> New Revision: 270850
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270850
>>
>> Log:
>> Save and restore FPU state across suspend and
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:58:20PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, August 30, 2014 05:48:38 PM John Baldwin wrote:
> > New Revision: 270850
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270850
> >
> > Log:
> > Save and restore FPU state across suspend and resume. In earlier
> > re
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 05:48:38 PM John Baldwin wrote:
> Author: jhb
> Date: Sat Aug 30 17:48:38 2014
> New Revision: 270850
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270850
>
> Log:
> Save and restore FPU state across suspend and resume. In earlier
> revisions of this patch, resume
Author: jhb
Date: Sat Aug 30 17:48:38 2014
New Revision: 270850
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270850
Log:
Save and restore FPU state across suspend and resume. In earlier revisions
of this patch, resumectx() called npxresume() directly, but that doesn't
work because resumect
16 matches
Mail list logo
